分享学习计划+每天作文练习

shan8006

原帖由 EmilyS 于 21-1-2011 02:28 发表
这个是The thirty-second essay。闪动太努力了我赶不上进度了

题目问的是究竟是positive还是negative, 开头结尾没有说清楚作者本人的观点。

截图最后一个as well.不小心截掉了。。。将就吧。。。

h ...

太辛苦你了，真不好意思
Thanks for your time.

shan8006

原帖由 icewd 于 22-1-2011 01:56 发表

Furthermore, globalization lets unskilled jobs move to cheaper countries, technology brings well-educated labours high premium. (globalization是美式写法，labour是英式写法，虽然雅思允许用美式拼写，但不允许在同一篇文章里出现两种写法。)

看老兄的文章开始有种看Economist的感觉了。

shan8006

原帖由 neverfree 于 22-1-2011 04:31 发表

The rapid economic growth creates a vast deal of new wealth but it also has led to a growing gap between rich and poor.
Such kind of situation can be found not only between developed countries and developing countries, but also among different social levels.
Therefore, this inequlity (inequality) should be addressed respectively.

Due to historic reasons, some countries are left far behind others in almost every aspect, especially in terms of science and technology, which have been utilized by the latter to steal enormous amount of wealth from the former.  With the globalization, many technic-previliged (privileged) countries seek to perform apparently unequal trades with lesser-advanced countries, for example,  by authorizing a relatively low-end technology to the latter, in return the former are permitted to exploit rare natural resources in their territories with unbelievable low price. In my point of view, this kind of transactions is actually a disguised invasion in the form of economic, which should be held responsible for the poverty in some countries and regions.

I think international aid for poor countries is crucial for mitigating this phenomenon. International organizations, such as United Nations and World Bank, should provide support to them in both technical  and financial fields, enabling them to improve infrastructures and strengthen industries, therefore they could be involved in international businesses at an even level.

In addition to above-mentioned issues, at a small scale, the wealth gap among different social groups should be attributed to injudicious domestic policies. The weak legal system and useless administration have allowed the greedy capital to grab huge money by manipulating market. In china for example, a lot of companies invest in real estate and compromise the price at an incredible high level, in which case the average-income people have to give out all their saving for one small house. Furthermore, unreasonable taxation system also plays a vital role in widening the gap. Again taking China as an evidence (evidence不可数), the 80% revenue of government is from ordinary employees in 2001, which is such heavy a burden for them and leaves them with poverty.

It is a necessity for the government to introduce balanced taxation and enforce administration over marketing, so that the wealth could be redistributed evenly. Otherwise, never could the gap be reduced between the rich and the poor. Governments are supposed to be judicious after all.

老兄字写太多了吧。。。

icewd

原帖由 shan8006 于 22-1-2011 20:53 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

看老兄的文章开始有种看Economist的感觉了。

多谢指正，原来我一直错觉+zation是英式

shan8006

原帖由 icewd 于 23-1-2011 01:02 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

多谢指正，原来我一直错觉+zation是英式

+sation是英式。最好的方法就是写在word里，它认为拼写错误的就是英式的。

shan8006

The thirty-fourth essay

Some people think it is the responsibility for government to ensure that people have healthy lifestyles. Others think people should have a free for their own lifestyles decisions. Discuss both and give your own opinion.

Answer:

Currently, as healthy lifestyle have been publicised frequently by some governments, some people argue that people have freedom to decide their own lifestyles. In my view, health always plays vital role in people's lives, for the sake of improving, governments should introduce healthy lifestyles, whereas individuals should respond actively.

Indeed, people of course have rights to decide their lifestyle. But people choose unhealthy lifestyles such as excessive smoking, excessive drinking and sedentary lifestyle are irresponsible for themselves, their households and even societies. Because they are impairing their body, so they have high rate to sicken. Subsequently, when they have sickened, that could disturb their family members to spend time and money to take care of them. Additionally, health care systems will be wasted if they expend funds to supply these people. Contrarily, people who keep healthy lifestyles would have lower risk of illness than them. As people have been increasingly wealthy nowadays, owning healthy body is a sort of happiness.

Certainly, governments always hope their citizens healthy. Not only would healthy citizenry contribute productivity and various taxes to nations, but also they relieve the strain to the resources of health care systems. For the benefit of improving public health, governments introduce some healthy lifestyles like walking after meal and doing exercise properly. However, those are not compulsory policies but well-meant admonitions because governments have no rights to meddle in people's lives.

Personally, people should be responsible for themselves, families and societies. Therefore, they should receive the governments' well-meant admonitions and attempt to adjust themselves to healthy lifestyles.

Summarily, people wish their body healthy as governments wish. Although they have rights to choose their lifestyle, while healthy lifestyles governments publicised are not compulsory. So they should receive governments' well-meant admonitions for the sake of keep health.

shan8006

The thirty-fifth essay

Some people believe that charity organisations should give the aid to those in great needs, wherever they lives, some people think that charity organisations should concentrate on helping people who lives in their own country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Answer:

As humanitarianism has high developed in this day and age, charity organisations have relieved a vast deal of people of poverty and misery. However, some people argue that charity organisations should focus on help domestic people instead of the entire human. In my view, humanitarianism as well as charity is a soul beyond national boundaries.

Charity means aiding people who live in misery and poverty. Indeed, some people might argue that too many domestic people need help, while charity institutions' funds are quite limited. Likewise, charity funds might basically depend on native people's donation, so those should be used on native people. That seems reasonable, but humanitarianism and charity are souls and aim to humankind. If those just focus on native people, so those will be lost their meaning and finally just become sort of social welfare.

However, the opponents believe that charity organisations should save people in great needs wherever they are. As a matter of fact, in many countries, charity institutions have helped numerous people in great needs. For instance, some charity organisations support accommodation to displaced persons who suffered disaster or persecution whether they are foreigner. In addition, many of international people who are suffering starvation, famine and plague have been aided by charity institutions from different countries. The global village has made people around the world as a big family in this day and age, thus people should help for every family member's difficulty.

Summarily, in my view, although charity organisations aid all the people could spend some native persons' donation, but numerous people would be save which is the most important things because the humanitarianism and the global village have associate humankind together.

icewd

楼主的第33篇是关于城市规划，或者说就是城市化的一个方面。在economist上作了些搜索，却不尽人意，干脆自己裸写了，看看真实水平。

请教：Beijing eventually fulfilled the environmental requirement that having air cleanness at certain level to hold Olympic Games in 2008 by forcing industries moved to suburban. 此处that having air cleanness at certain level用法对吗？

题目：
In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move out of large cities and into regional area, do you think advantage of this development outweigh its disadvantage.

提纲：
正方2个观点——改善环境，提供更多工作机会；反方1个观点——增加负担

正文：
Across the world urbanisation is something to be very controversial, not least it lets industries and businesses move out of metropolitan and into rural region. All in all to be as clear as crystal, I am side with that such reform overcomes the frictions it could bring up with.

The basic concept sounds simple enough: that large city should be designated for people's living regard of their climate environment, job opportunity and cost of living. First of all, it is well known that industries play a crucial role on environment affecting and climate changing, without debating the consequences of those chemical pollutants emit and noises generate but giving an actual example, Beijing eventually fulfilled the environmental requirement that having air cleanness at certain level to hold Olympic Games in 2008 by forcing industries moved to suburban. Furthermore, encouraging business organisations gather together indeed helps resources of society to be relocated and reconfigured, with closer cooperations and ampler competitions, more job opportunities create.

Admittedly, advance comes with sting. Living cost begin to boost while firms are moving into regional area, not only should the cost show on travelling bill and time spending, but also it comes up with other social issues especially children's education, those who are working out side of city barely have much time to be with their children. Viewed from this perspective policymakers need to focus on improving traffic condition and providing relevant school facilities such as after-school care.

The trend that more industries and businesses move to district area is almost certain to continue, despite of the negativities, both society and individual will continuously benefit from it.

[ 本帖最后由 icewd 于 26-1-2011 00:49 编辑 ]

crystali99

2011年第二次回来探亲
我最近已经把英语忘掉了，嘿嘿，走路上看见啥字母串都想用法语来拼！

shan8006

感觉越接近过年越是忙不过来，实在是没法子坚持一天一篇了。

The thirty-sixth essay

Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to some countries where cannot be grown or out of season. Some people think it is not justified. To what extent do you agree?

Answer:

As transportation technologies are developing rapidly in this day and age, increasing aeroplanes are used for fruit and vegetable exports to some countries where cannot be grown or out of season, whereas some people believe it is unjustified. In my view, fruit and vegetable exports by airfreight is an unavoidable development.

Indeed, it seems fruit and vegetable exports by airfreight that is unjustified to some extent. As a matter of fact, its overhead cost is higher than other export ways. Subsequently, the high costs could cause those goods prices increase as well. Finally, customers who live in the countries imported those fruit and vegetables have to pay not only those goods prices themselves but also extra high transport costs they included. Additionally, exporting by aeroplanes also augment flights, which will extra consume natural resources as well as cause air pollution and noise disturbing citizens who live near the airports.

However, both countries which import and export fruit and vegetables will benefit from airfreight. More precisely, in terms of export, countries will gain huge profits from that. Unlike other goods, fruit and vegetables cannot be stored for a long time. Thus airfreight becomes a proper way to transport those thereby ensuring them fresh. That allows countries to sale those fresh fruit and vegetables to other countries. Because these goods cannot be grown or out of season in those countries, so they might be sold expensively. Likewise, people who live in those countries are enabled to enrich their lives by those foods. Now, they can eat some foods which they have never seen before or out of season.

Summarily, In my view, although export fruit and vegetables by aeroplanes might be unjustified to some extent, but that enriches people's lives and brings huge profits to countries.

shan8006

原帖由 icewd 于 26-1-2011 00:45 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

楼主的第33篇是关于城市规划，或者说就是城市化的一个方面。在economist上作了些搜索，却不尽人意，干脆自己裸写了，看看真实水平。

请教：Beijing eventually fulfilled the environmental requirement that hav ...

fulfill是美式的，英式是fulfil

shan8006

原帖由 crystali99 于 27-1-2011 01:15 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

2011年第二次回来探亲
我最近已经把英语忘掉了，嘿嘿，走路上看见啥字母串都想用法语来拼！

恭喜茉莉姐达到语言的最高境界——忘记
我实在是想把中文给忘掉才好。

narcsity

闪动，我的成绩出来了。
L=6 R=5.5 W=6 S=5 A=5.5
在我的意料之中。我觉得口语现在是个问题。
写作的话，我那天写得超级烂，居然还得了6分，真的难以想象。。。
看来一个月的时间还是不够，我还要加油复习。
努力努力！！！

salime

原帖由 shan8006 于 27-1-2011 18:30 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

感觉越接近过年越是忙不过来，实在是没法子坚持一天一篇了。

闪动同学要加油，以你为榜样呢

浮云云艾米莉

考雅思英式美式都可以写的，只要consistent. 不要一会elevator, 一会civilisation的就好了。

祝烤鸭的同学新年快乐     我都6年没过年了啊啊

好，今天争取改个1-2篇。反正code在compile没有事情做.

浮云云艾米莉

原帖由 shan8006 于 27-1-2011 18:30 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

感觉越接近过年越是忙不过来，实在是没法子坚持一天一篇了。

The thirty-sixth essay

Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to some countries where cannot be grown or ou ...

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

浮云云艾米莉

啊竟然已经compile完了！！好快！！

icewd

原帖由 EmilyS 于 28-1-2011 03:40 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

貌似aeroplane源于法语，出差坐法航见过。像garage，后来英语也用，这个写作里用没问题吧

[ 本帖最后由 icewd 于 28-1-2011 09:05 编辑 ]

浮云云艾米莉

原帖由 icewd 于 28-1-2011 09:03 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

貌似aeroplane源于法语，出差坐法航见过。像garage，后来英语也用，这个写作里用没问题吧

可能源于法语吧？现在英语也用，没关系。aero-在英语里是航天的前缀，英式里是aeroplane, 美式里是airplane。

shan8006

今天上班，晚上同事聚餐，赶紧上来发作文，回家再慢慢看帖子

The thirty-seventh essay

In some countries, the national traditional arts are facing extinction. Some people think that the government should support them. Do you agree or disagree? What should the government do?

Answer:

In this day and age, as human societies have developed rapidly in various areas, while national traditional arts trend to go extinct. For the sake of saving, some people believe governments should make efforts to support them.

In my view, not governments' efforts but individuals' can save the national traditional arts going extinct. As a matter of fact, there are too many fresh and fashion things brought by globalisation impacting people nowadays. In contrast, national traditional arts are engulfed by those. In the course of time, that might reach an endangered level. Thus, not only can governments' supports retrieve the importance of traditional arts, but also individuals' regard plays the same important role in achieving this objective.

However, governments and individuals can make a concerted effort to retrieve the importance of traditional arts. The citizenry of a nation always have patriotic emotions including national pride and national cultural identities as well as traditional arts. They might just forget temporarily because of a vast deal of international cultures' aggression. So, governments should publicise or educate national culture like traditional arts to their citizens in particular the next generation. As a consequence, people's patriotism would be wakened. They might preserve their national culture and take pride in that. Likewise, governments can also allocate money to sponsor some traditional art exhibitions and invest some art libraries thereby developing their national culture.

Summarily, in my view, saving national traditional arts might need governments and individuals to make a concerted efforts instead of just governments' support. Governments should waken their citizenry to preserve their own cultural heritage and develop them thereby strengthening the status of traditional arts in people's mind.

crystal08418

闪动哥，加油，像你学习！

hjx500

L 8   R9     W 6.5     S6.5     

继续努力，下次再来

shan8006

明天和后天和朋友们去旅游泡温泉 作文就。。。

The thirty-eighth essay

In todays world, it is private companies rather than government who pay for and carry out most on scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

Answer

Currently, as increasing private enterprises sponsor and carry out on most scientific research, that brings many of advantages as well as disadvantages. Personally, I think the advantages that brought outweigh the disadvantages.

Undoubtedly, people have benefited greatly from some technologies enterprises invested in and researched. As a matter of fact, people might live uncomfortably and inconveniently without those technologies such as telecommunication and means of transportation. These rapidly developing technologies not only contribute high profits to the enterprises who have allocated money to and carried out these scientific objects but also make people's lives less time-consuming and more efficient. In particular medical research results, numerous incurable patients before have been cured or improved by up-to-date diagnostic and therapeutic method.

However, the technical monopoly of enterprises' scientific research might cause some problems. Because the scientific research is sponsored and conducted by enterprises, so they have rights to preserve their research results. As a consequence, their products own inherent advantages to monopolise and dominate the market. For instance, Microsoft had monopolised the computer os-system by their product: Windows for a long years. Even some countries' governments use the Windows to handle their daily business. Every thing is not perfect actually. If the leaks of the system is utilised by some people who hold grudge against societies, the consequences might be catastrophic.

Summarily, In my opinion, even though scientific research sponsored and conducted by companies could cause monopolies but the benefits from that to people are great. Thus, I believe its advantages outweigh disadvantages.

shan8006

原帖由 narcsity 于 27-1-2011 23:22 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

闪动，我的成绩出来了。
L=6 R=5.5 W=6 S=5 A=5.5
在我的意料之中。我觉得口语现在是个问题。
写作的话，我那天写得超级烂，居然还得了6分，真的难以想象。。。
看来一个月的时间还是不够，我还要加油复习。
努 ...

看到你的分数，距离四个6不大了，加油啊！口语还是要多练习，最近买了本“口语31个必背公式”感觉很好，对答题逻辑很有帮助，而10天适合增加表达的多样性。

shan8006

原帖由 salime 于 28-1-2011 02:16 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

闪动同学要加油，以你为榜样呢

恩，我不会放弃的

shan8006

原帖由 EmilyS 于 28-1-2011 03:05 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

考雅思英式美式都可以写的，只要consistent. 不要一会elevator, 一会civilisation的就好了。

祝烤鸭的同学新年快乐     我都6年没过年了啊啊

好，今天争取改个1-2篇。反正code在compile没有事情做 ...

晕，怎么会6年没过年。不知道澳洲过年时什么气氛，感觉国内的过年氛围真不如我小时候那么热闹了。
新年快乐

shan8006

原帖由 EmilyS 于 28-1-2011 03:41 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

啊竟然已经compile完了！！好快！！

膜拜，EmilyS看英文的速度快赶上中文了。
换句话说，我现在的作文是不是和老外写的越见靠拢了?

shan8006

原帖由 icewd 于 28-1-2011 09:03 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

貌似aeroplane源于法语，出差坐法航见过。像garage，后来英语也用，这个写作里用没问题吧

对，英式的用aeroplane。但貌似他们对这个和airplane分得并不是很细。
就像center应该是英式的，但我看到很多听力的tapescript里用centre，而且和neighbourhood出现在同一篇里。

shan8006

原帖由 crystal08418 于 28-1-2011 18:55 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

闪动哥，加油，像你学习！

你也加油！

shan8006

原帖由 hjx500 于 28-1-2011 23:36 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

L 8   R9     W 6.5     S6.5     

继续努力，下次再来

我那个寒 。。老兄的听力阅读那个实在是佩服地五体投地。
加油！你可能就缺运气了。