情感天空 今日: 13 |主题: 1066|排名: 34 

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
原文链接：
http://www.theage.com.au/nationa ... 20120919-266a8.html



Advocates will shift their focus to legalising same sex marriage at the state level, after Federal MPs yesterday voted down a bill which would have allowed gay couples to marry.

Wong vows to fight on for baby daughter

The bill, introduced by Labor backbencher Stephen Jones, was defeated in the house of representatives 98 votes to 42. Ten of the 17 Cabinet Ministers in the lower house, Green Adam Bandt and independents Andrew Wilkie, Rob Oakeshott and Craig Thomson voted for same sex marriage. All coalition MPs, Prime Minister Julia Gillard, Treasurer Wayne Swan and former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd voted against the bill.

Channelling another former Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, Mr Jones urged campaigners to "maintain your rage," while the Australian Christian Lobby head Jim Wallace said it was time for the parliament to "move on."

Gay rights activists said they would now look to state and territory parliaments to make the change.
Advertisement
"Now the federal parliament has effectively brushed the wishes of a majority of Australians aside, the states and territories will take the lead, making me confident we will see same sex marriages performed somewhere in Australia by the end of the year," Australian Marriage Equality convener Alex Greenwich said.
Tasmania's lower house last month passed a bill to legalise gay marriage. It must still pass the state's 15-seat Legislative Council to become law. Efforts to legalise same sex marriage are also underway in South Australia, the ACT and New South Wales, where Premier Barry O'Farrell will allow his MPs a free vote.
UNSW law professor George Williams said state same sex marriage would be a step forward, but was not a substitute for national recognition because a marriage conducted in one state would not be recognised outside it.
Meanwhile, chief opposition whip Warren Entsch said he would consult with gay rights campaigners, opposition leader Tony Abbott and his coalition colleagues about introducing a bill for "civil partnerships," which would provide national legal recognition to both same and opposite sex couples.
The Senate is today (Thursday) expected to vote on a separate same sex marriage bill co-sponsored by Labor Senators Trish Crossin, Carol Brown, Gavin Marshall and Louise Pratt.
In debate yesterday, Finance Minister Penny Wong, whose partner Sophie Allouache gave birth to a baby girl in December, described as "hurtful" arguments by some Senators that the children of same-sex couples were worse off than those raised by heterosexual couples.
"I do not regret that our daughter has Sophie and I as parents," Senator Wong said.
"I do regret that she lives in a world where some will tell her that her family is not normal. I regret that even in this chamber, elected representatives denigrate the worth of her family. I will not rest in the face of such prejudice. I want for her, for all of us, an Australia which is inclusive and respectful, and this is why this campaign will not end here."
Openly gay Liberal Senator Dean Smith spoke against the bill, saying opinion in the gay community was divided on the issue. "By not agreeing to same sex marriage, I'm not choosing to endorse discrimination against my fellow gay and lesbian Australians, or to be disrespectful to their domestic relationships... instead for me, it's an honest acknowledgement of the special and unique characteristics of the union described as marriage," he said.
While nine Greens senators and at least 20 Labor senators are expected to vote for same-sex marriage in the Senate the bill is unlikely to receive the 39 votes it would need to pass the upper house.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/nationa ... .html#ixzz26vRN3XA5

最后发表： in10ts
回复内容：


这个就。。。不擅长了，误导你了，你还不拍死我呀

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
这个帖子也备份一下

向虫子的道歉帖
http://freeoz.org/ibbs/thread-1034429-1-1.html

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  Boswell的话，只能当笑话听听了，笑死我了。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
尽管明天注定不会通过，但是今天我们已经取得了历史性的胜利，同志们再接再厉，直到成功，我们绝不言放弃！

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
You are talking about in China, aren't you?

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  Ben 是英国前橄榄球明星，已经退役，拥有很多同志球迷，他自己是异性恋，并且已经结婚生子。他的听觉有一些弱，因此也致力于改善橄榄球对有听觉障碍的人的改进。

Ben 除了公开和不遗余力的支持同性恋，还自己创办了一个凡欺凌 anti-bully的基金会。Google Ben Cochen的图片，很可爱，好多裸照啊！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Nationals Senator Ron Boswell apparently believes people should strictly adhere to stereotypical, sexist, gender roles. He just made the following outrageous, sexist, homophobic comments speaking against marriage equality in the Senate:

"There's no support for gay marriage in the Western suburbs or among blue collar workers"

"It hurts society and people haven't thought it through"

"2 mothers or 2 fathers can't raise a child properly. Who takes the boy to football? Who tells him what's right from wrong? What does he do? Go along with mum, or 2 mums? How does he go camping or fishing? It won't work, It's defying nature!"

"Once you legalize something you can't discriminate against it"

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
目前有2个联合党议员，9个绿党参议员和20个工党参议院支持同性婚姻。但是如果要同性婚姻通过立法，还需要另外9票的支持。本周晚些时候上议远投票，通过的可能性不大。

目前绿党支持同性婚姻，工党允许党员自由投票，但是联合党却禁止党员投赞同票，也就是联合党党员只能或者是弃权或者是反对。

塔斯马尼亚同性婚姻已经通过下议院，等待上议院进行投票。SA和ACT也在积极争取中。WA的同性婚姻正在等待下议院投票。

目前澳洲议会一共有4个提案等待投票，2个来自绿党，2个来自工党。







Carr supports same-sex marriage

September 17, 2012

Dan Harrison

Foreign Minister Bob Carr has declared his support of same-sex marriage. Photo: Reuters
FOREIGN Minister Bob Carr has become the latest Labor MP to declare his support for same-sex marriage.

Senator Carr, who has not made his position on the issue public until now, yesterday told The Age his support for gay marriage was consistent with the work he did as New South Wales premier to remove discrimination against gay and lesbian people from state laws. Senator Carr said that while he respected the views of those who held more conservative opinions on marriage, to him it ''seemed churlish to deny access to marriage to groups that wanted it''.

His statement comes as the Senate begins debating proposals by four Labor senators to legalise gay marriage.

While support for same-sex marriage is stronger in the Senate than in the House of Representatives, campaigners are pessimistic about the bill passing when it goes to a vote later this week.

Nine Greens senators and at least 20 Labor senators are expected to vote for change, but a further nine votes would be needed for the bill to pass. Among those yet to declare their position are Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and independent senator Nick Xenophon.

Coalition senators are bound to vote against change. While the Coalition does not expel members for voting against its position, campaigners say those who support same-sex marriage are being strongly discouraged by the leadership from voting against its position.

Australian Marriage Equality convener Alex Greenwich said if the bill was defeated, it would not be the last vote on the issue.

He said momentum for change was ''unstoppable'' and ''huge progress'' had been made since 2009, when only six senators, all from the Greens, voted for an earlier bill to legalise same-sex marriage.

''Now we are able to see how far we've got with this campaign, and how much more we need to do,'' he said.

Mr Greenwich said in the lead-up to next year's election campaigners would target Liberals in inner city seats - such as Malcolm Turnbull, Josh Frydenberg and Kelly O'Dwyer - to put pressure on the Coalition to allow its members a free vote on the issue.

He said same-sex marriage would be legalised ''state by state and territory by territory''.

Tasmania's lower house has already passed a bill to legalise same-sex marriage, while efforts to make the change are under way in South Australia and the ACT, and the Greens have announced they will introduce gay marriage legislation in the Western Australian Parliament.

But Mr Greenwich called on supporters of gay marriage to work together. There are four separate bills to legalise gay marriage before the Federal Parliament: two sponsored by Greens and two sponsored by Labor MPs.

Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who has her own gay marriage bill before the Senate, accused Labor of a ''cynical ploy'' to push the issue off the agenda by putting it up for a vote before there was sufficient support for it to pass. She said she had invited other senators to co-sponsor her bill.



Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion ... .html#ixzz26hLWGBRk

[ 本帖最后由 xblues 于 17-9-2012 14:49 编辑 ]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.examiner.com.au/story ... port-for-son/?cs=95

最后发表： 风中藤
回复内容：
揭秘：捐精者领完三千元补助不能续捐

海淀区大慧寺路12号的国家人口计生委科研所，北京唯一的人类精子库就位于其二楼。近日，记者连续探访。

取精室贴有女体照

9月7日上午10点，十几平方米的“精子库接待室”中，一名男工作人员正对一位戴着鸭舌帽的捐精者讲解注意事项。

交代完相关权利和义务之后，工作人员拿出一份《捐精志愿者初筛登记表》给“鸭舌帽”，需要填写个人信息，身高、体重、兴趣爱好等。

“签完字后，我们会对你做一个简单的外部触摸检查，然后就可以开始初筛的流程。”说着，工作人员同“鸭舌帽”来到一个布帘后面，2分钟后，两人走出，工作人员递给“鸭舌帽”一个绿盖的圆柱形塑料杯，带他走进取精室。

一个约30平方米的房间被隔出两小间，作为两间取精室，每间取精室中，又各有两个小间，每个小间约5平米大小。

在这个颜色以粉色为主的取精室里，有一张半人长的粉色沙发，沙发旁的一张小桌上，放着一卷卫生纸，桌子一侧设有垃圾桶。

房间四周墙壁上，都贴有人体艺术照（女性裸露画像），房间里没有电脑。

多次检测合格后方可捐精

约半小时后，“鸭舌帽”从取精室中出来，将取精杯放在托盘上，签字收取20元的补贴。

“鸭舌帽”看上去20岁出头，有些腼腆。他是外交学院的大学生，最近看到呼吁捐精的报道，才来试一试，“第一次到陌生环境，感觉捐精过程比较困难。”

按照精子库的捐献流程，将对每位志愿者进行2到3次精液质量筛查及冷冻复苏实验，每次检查前，要求禁欲3至7天，如检查合格，志愿者会继续接受健康体检和抽血化验检查，全部合格才能成为正式捐精者。

关于补助，该工作人员表示，“初筛时，每次有20元交通补贴，正式捐精开始后，志愿者需完成8到10次的精子捐献，每次补助50元，这些全部完成，半年之后，捐献者要再接受艾滋病毒的检查。待全部检查结束，确认精子合格后，志愿者方可领取全部3000元补助。”

工作人员表示，志愿者只能在一个精子库捐精；其领完3000元补助后，将无法继续在该精子库捐精，并领取补助。

■ 北京精子库捐精条件

北京精子库的工作人员表示，只要年龄在22～45周岁，中国国籍，身体健康，无遗传性疾病及家族史，近2年内在北京有相对稳定的居所和工作，高中以上学历，经精液筛选和身体检查合格，就可以成为精子库的捐精者。

“同时，我们还有一些小要求，包括身高170cm以上，裸眼视力4.3以上，学历高中以上。这也是考虑受精夫妇对捐精者条件的挑选需求。”该工作人员表示。

在北京人类精子库的官方博客上，曾有一份近500人参与的调查，其中，共列出有可能的16个不去捐精的理由，排名前六的理由如下：

原因 人数 百分比

1、捐精程序太复杂，懒得去 171 18.9%

2、宣传不够，对捐精和精子库都不了解 161 17.8%

3、给钱少了点，不够辛苦的呢 128 14.1%

4、想捐但有顾虑，担心个人信息泄露 114 12.6%

5、精子库接待时间不合适、地点远 88 9.7%

6、家人朋友知道了怎么办（不好意思） 70 7.7%

■ 相关规定：《人类精子库管理办法》

第三条 精子的采集和提供应当遵守当事人自愿和符合社会伦理原则。

任何单位和个人不得以营利为目的进行精子的采集与提供活动。

第十三条 精子的采集与提供应当在经过批准的人类精子库中进行。未经批准，任何单位和个人不得从事精子的采集与提供活动。

《人类辅助生殖技术管理办法》

第三条 人类辅助生殖技术的应用应当在医疗机构中进行，以医疗为目的，并符合国家计划生育政策、伦理原则和有关法律规定。禁止以任何形式买卖配子、合子、胚胎。医疗机构和医务人员不得实施任何形式的代孕技术

最后发表： truelove
回复内容：
come on.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
又见繁殖论............

都是异性繁殖的例子不用看远了，看近代中国就可以了，那么多异性恋猪一样的繁殖，最后只能实施强制性的控制人口，计划生育了。

可见，异性恋大多了也不是好事，而且历史已经证实了。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

最后发表： choz
回复内容：

其实根据调查，同性恋的比例，不论是在对同性恋宽松的西方国家还是对同性恋迫害的穆斯林国家，基本是维持不变的。
同性恋在西方国家比例高只是一个假想，因为西方国家对同性恋日渐宽松所以更多的同性恋出柜了。在中国因为对同性恋有歧视，所以大多数同性恋都隐藏性向和异性结婚了。但是他们依然被同性吸引，很多婚后在婚外找同性小三。造成很多同妻同夫的杯具！
做个比喻，你会觉得如果哪天整个社会对异性恋打压了，就会降低异性恋的比例？你就有可能转变成同性恋，对同性有感觉了？

[ 本帖最后由 choz 于 15-9-2012 23:34 编辑 ]

最后发表： black_zerg
回复内容：
这姑娘大牙一个逢，看的我好生别扭

最后发表： 敏感词
回复内容：
女屌丝泡会所，愣充白富美

好在逃出了天朝出离升天，满大街白屌丝红脖子，是随便挑来随便选

华丽丽的翻个页 俺就先遁了，省的唾沫星子沾腚上......你们在会所里慢慢玩

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
因为桶泥也知道自己的想法不占主流，万一让良心投票，他就失控。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and Fox News.

[youtube]_TBd-UCwVAY[/youtube]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
我经常在FreeOZ发一些关于同性恋平权运动的帖子，遭到很多人的非议，认为我是在强奸众人眼球。在辩论中，很多人多提到大多数人利益和民主。

辩论中发现，FreeOZ的民主，和很多上FreeOZ的人一直高喊民主，却丝毫不知道什么才是民主，或者对民主的意识还停留在自我意识的那种狭隘的民主。请看下面关于民主的解释：

The greatest challenge for democracies is not so much in how well they look after the majority, but in how well they are able to protect the rights and recognise the aspirations of individuals and small minorities.

即：民主的挑战和意义不在于如何保证大多数人的利益，而在于如何保护少数人和作为个体的每个人的合法权益。

http://citynews.com.au/2012/christian-soldier-comes-a-cropper/

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
If proud Americans can be who they are and boldly stand at the altar with who they love then surely, surely we can give everyone in this country a fair chance at that great American Dream.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
  感觉印第安人更好一些。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/whereyourmpstands/

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
How about reading this from Men's view? Investment VS Commodity. A good investment returns profit stably in long term. You focus on the profit you gain and believe in your own eye sight and choice.

How do you pick up commodity? Within your capability, pick up the most fashionable, fancy, beautiful one and finally it will be replaced by another more better one in the future. You focus on your own need.

Somehow Christianity gives a traditional view of men and women which sounds familiar with far eastern Asian's. Men and Women are equal but different. Women is created for Men to complete himself by union with him as a family. Men need to take the lead ship in family to raise and protect it. Women need to support his husband.

After Individualism and Feminism, with the economy grows, that tradition kindly doesn't fit women's needs any more. Before we abandon out of date legacy, have we found the solid rock of the new principle?

最后发表： Richard.G
回复内容：
这个还是找个机会心平气和跟你老婆好好谈谈，我个人感觉她要么对财务发足够的安全感，就是对你缺乏足够的安全感。 我觉得缺乏安全感的婚姻还是有潜在冲突的。拿买房子的事情来说，她的理由是反问你“难道你对我不放心。 那你可以以同样的理由只写自己的名字。 我不认为夫妻共有的东西写两个人的名字有什么不妥。   当然仅仅写一方的名字，而另一方不介意也没问题。

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
So emotional without any fact, pure feeling.

最后发表： y2kgo
回复内容：
是神马nie？

最后发表： 风中藤
回复内容：
我要一所大房子
有很多很多的房间
一个房间有最快的网路
一个房间有很多的吉他
一个房间有我漂亮的衣服
一个房间住著朋友和他的爱人
一个房间一个房间
我也不知道该放些什么

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Brad Pitt Backs Obama: 'Gay Marriage Is Inevitable'

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/10/brad-pitt-obama-gay-marriage-_n_1870712.html?1347291112&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

Brad Pitt and his mother clearly have different political views.
In an interview with The Telegraph, the "Moneyball" star lent his support to Barack Obama, noting the president's controversial backing of same-sex marriage.
"I am an Obama supporter and I’m backing his election campaign,” Pitt said at a screening of his forthcoming film "Killing Them Softly" in London. “Gay marriage is inevitable. The next generation, they get it. It is just a matter of time before it becomes a reality.”
The gay-friendly leading man's comments follow those of his conservative mother Jane, who backed Mitt Romney ina controversial letter to Missouri's Springfield News-Leader in July.
"Any Christian who does not vote or writes in a name is casting a vote for Romney’s opponent, Barack Hussein Obama -- a man who sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for years, did not hold a public ceremony to mark the National Day of Prayer, and is a liberal who supports the killing of unborn babies and same-sex marriage," Jane wrote in her letter.
Jane's letter was penned in response to that of another reader, who argued, "Traditional Christians believe in gender equality. They believe Mormon theology denigrates women."
This isn't the first time the 48-year-old Pitt has spoken out in favor of marriage equality. "No state should decide who can marry and who cannot," Brad is quoted byPeople magazine as saying last year. "Thanks to the tireless work of so many, someday soon this discrimination will end and every American will be able to enjoy their equal right to marriage."

最后发表： 我无聊
回复内容：
想了解到自己去看吧。

http://pop.6park.com/life5/messages/25673.html

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
强烈支持。澳洲我支持吉拉德。

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
&w=250&h=180&zc=1&q=90

GP banned after prescribing gay “cure”

Posted on 10 September 2012

More Sharing ServicesShare | Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print

A NSW doctor belonging to the Exclusive Brethren religious sect has been banned from practising as a GP after prescribing chemical castration as a “cure” for homosexuality.
Mark Christopher James Craddock prescribed an 18-year-old man anti-androgen therapy cyproterone acetate (Cyprostat) when he approached Craddock in 2008 seeking a treatment for being gay.
The patient, who cannot be named for legal reasons, complained to the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission earlier this year before it was sent to the Medical Council of NSW.
A council hearing held last month was told the young man came out as gay in 2008 and was told by a Exclusive Brethren leader that “there’s medication you can go on for these things”. The leader then referred him on to Craddock.
The young man, who was visiting Australia at the time from New Zealand on a working holiday, was staying with a member of the Exclusive Brethren Church who helped facilitate the appointment with Craddock and drove him to Craddock’s home.
Craddock then saw the man in his home and prescribed the drug which lowers the libido and is used for treating prostate cancer victims and for sexual deviancy.
The Medical Council found that Craddock did not make a proper physical psychologist nor did he discuss the side effects of the drug, which includes impotence in some cases.
Craddock admitted that it was a mistake to prescribe so much medication with out proper checks prior and said the drug should not have been prescribed.
He was found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct and was restricted to only practicing as a radiologist with restrictions on prescriptions he could write for patients outside that field except in emergency situations.

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
Marriage equality advocates believe the reform would pass if the Coalition had a conscience vote.

The claim comes as Liberal front-bencher, Malcolm Turnbull, re-iterated his in-principle support for equality but declared it would not pass even if he and other Coalition members were allowed a conscience vote.

Australian Marriage Equality national convener, Alex Greenwich said,

“If there was a Coalition conscience vote, more Coalition MPs would be seeking out the views of their constituents, seriously considering the case for reform, and generally opening their hearts and minds to the need for change”.

“We implore Mr Abbott to abide by Coalition tradition and allow a conscience vote on a reform that has majority support across the Australian community.”

“Rather than breaking a Coalition tradition and forcing his members to vote as a collective, Mr Abbott should allow Liberals to vote according to their own conscience and the views of their electorate” Mr Greenwich said.

Today in Parliament Mr Turnbull said: “Were a free vote to be permitted, I could support legislation that would recognise same-sex couples as married.”

Mr Turnbull went on to say he would support civil unions, despite his own polling showing most people in his electorate oppose them, and despite Tony Abbott ruling them out as an option both at the last election and more recently.

Mr Greenwich said it will be hypocritical of Coalition MPs like Mr Turnbull to be allowed to vote for civil unions and not for marriage equality.

“Either MPs like Malcolm Turnbull are allowed a conscience vote on both marriage equality and civil unions or neither.”

“For Mr Turnbull to be allowed to vote to entrench discrimination through a civil union scheme but prohibited from voting for full equality through an amendment to the Marriage Act is an insult to the majority of Australians who support marriage equality.”

Mr Greenwich said civil unions are a second-class form of recognition which have proven to be ‘a failed experiment‘ in countries like New Zealand and the UK which are now moving towards marriage equality instead.

For more information contact Alex Greenwich on 0421 316 335

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
我已经在Change.org 签名了，我负责FreeOZ上的饭桶们！

很多饭桶的共同特点是：自己意识不到自己是饭桶，需要加强关于饭桶知识普及教育！

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
这一集很精彩。
[youtube]vBXJbVT638c[/youtube]

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
挺好看的，主角是一个印度阿三医生，谁说阿三不帅啊。

[youtube]UWnTLMD_t1w[/youtube]
[youtube]P6GbAvyY-Z0[/youtube]
[youtube]vSQTUJ0iR-c[/youtube]
[youtube]_ZmY_UXP4mA[/youtube]
[youtube]d1eW55XHLOo[/youtube]

最后发表： ozbird
回复内容：
旺夫与否，主要不是面相，而是态度。王姐的心态很好，所以能旺夫。

最后发表： eternitylove
回复内容：
挺正点的，喜欢。