找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 1774|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【24 May】新SOL还是不能解决不确定性

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 25-5-2010 19:53:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
campus review比较侧重在本地教育和移民政策对本地影响的消息上
也是一个反馈媒体对移民政策变化的窗口
New migration list doesn’t resolve uncertainty

The new migration skills list has finally been released – but the jury’s still out on what it means.

The new skilled occupation list (SOL), which outlines the occupations to be considered under the general skilled migration (GSM) program from July, won’t do much to resolve the uncertainty for would-be international students – because the government is still deciding how many if any migration points these occupations will attract. (跟PT没有关系了,专业分数是另外的)

Maurene Horder, CEO of the Migration Institute of Australia (MIA), welcomed the new list “following months of nervous anticipation, including a missed 30 April deadline”.

Unfortunately this list is just one element of coming GSM changes by the Commonwealth. We are still waiting on a new points test to accompany it,” she said.(这种说法是 coming changes,PT会跟着SOL一起,不过一样没有明确时间)

The “new and more targeted” SOL was promised by immigration minister Chris Evans in February as part of reforms to make the GSM more responsive to labour market demands, and to address migration-fuelled distortions of international education.

The reforms included the immediate scrapping of the migration occupations in demand list (MODL) and the phasing out of the critical skills list(个人觉得,71直接删除CSL,就不算phase out,看移民局下一步动作了), which had effectively replaced the MODL in determining the occupations targeted by overseas students hoping to migrate to Australia.

Evans said the latest list would be a cut-down version of the original SOL, which listed over 400 occupations theoretically eligible for skilled migration. Would-be migrants will have to nominate occupations on the new SOL – now reduced to 181 occupations (CR, 24.05.10) – if they apply for GSM visas from July.

The exceptions may be GSM applicants who’ve managed to secure sponsorship from employers or state or territory governments. Their occupations won’t have to be on the SOL if they’re included in state migration plans. But the states and territories have only just started developing these plans, in accordance with a vague – and highly unlikely – mid-year deadline.

Would-be applicants studying occupations on the new SOL now know they’ve made it past first base, and won’t necessarily need to be sponsored. But they don’t know much more than that, because the points test – which previously awarded applicants with specialised occupations up to 60 of the 120 points they needed to qualify for GSM – is also being reviewed.

A discussion paper released on 12 February raised the possibility that specialised occupations wouldn’t earn any migration points at all (CR online 22.02.10).
(如果最终稿,专业没有分数的话,那么说明PT 71一定会出无疑了)
Responses to the paper were due on 12 March but the government hasn’t given any indication when it will announce the results of the review or any changes stemming from it.

Education commentators have applauded Evans for reforming the old GSM system and addressing unsavoury aspects of the education-migration nexus. But there’s growing concern that the slow pace and lingering uncertainty of the reforms has contributed to a slump in new overseas enrolments, particularly with English language colleges.

Most recently, The Australian reported that student applications to the key agent IDP had slumped 40 per cent in April alone.

Australian Council for Private Education and Training CEO Andrew Smith told ABC Radio that uncertainty and continual change in immigration policy were hurting Australia’s reputation and causing students to look to other countries.

“We are seen as having an unstable policy environment and it means that investment is being made elsewhere,” he said.

In a submission on the points test review, Universities Australia warned the immigration department that the “quality linkage between education and migration” needed to be maintained.

“To do otherwise is to short-change Australia’s universities and to hand global markets in this field to the growing competition from Europe, North America and Asia,” it said.

Horder said the ongoing uncertainty left would-be migrants, agents and international education providers stuck in the “old runaround”.

“The purpose of this new list is to make a significant impact on the number and makeup of migrants to Australia, and it will. It significantly impacts potential migrants, our higher education sector and areas across Australia suffering from acute skills shortages. What we don’t know yet is how negative that impact will be.”

[ 本帖最后由 hishaken 于 25-5-2010 20:24 编辑 ]

评分

参与人数 1威望 +10 收起 理由
benladeng414 + 10 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
 楼主| 发表于 25-5-2010 19:53:47 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言
有空我在MARK一下
跟以前经常在滴答发新闻的目的一样,
发最近的新闻
1是为了让大家了解及时的新闻和外界(包括工业界)对移民政策更改的反馈
2是大家(包括我)也能通过看英文报道提高英文水平

知己知彼,才能百战不殆
如果没有hight light请大家见谅,有空我一定把关键的地方mark 出来
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 25-5-2010 20:06:23 | 只看该作者
我highlight出来的内容


But the states and territories have only just started developing these plans, in accordance with a vague – and highly unlikely – mid-year deadline

Responses to the paper were due on 12 March but the government hasn’t given any indication when it will announce the results of the review or any changes stemming from it

Most recently, The Australian reported that student applications to the key agent IDP had slumped 40 per cent in April alone. Australian Council for Private Education and Training CEO Andrew Smith told ABC Radio that uncertainty and continual change in immigration policy were hurting Australia’s reputation and causing students to look to other countries.

n a submission on the points test review, Universities Australia warned the immigration department that the “quality linkage between education and migration” needed to be maintained

没有我关心的内容
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 25-5-2010 20:11:59 | 只看该作者
原来澳洲也有反对的声音啊...可惜势在必行了...
感谢楼主分享~~
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 25-5-2010 20:25:21 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言

有的,改革都是双面的,必然又受到影响的集团,比如嫌本地劳工费用过高的老板,学校等
mark完毕,大家慢读
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 25-5-2010 21:10:47 | 只看该作者
我关注他们针对CSL的用词,在2.8号新政上的用词是revoke...这里评论是phasing out....看来7.1号还不太可能就停掉CSL..估计要一个过程.我猜想大致能托到10月份吧,3个月,因为,如果按照现在职业评估机构的反应,要reveiw ASCO到ANZCO,这样从7.1号新申请的人,至少要经过3个月的时间才能完成这个重新评估...

瞎推理,纯属娱乐..
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 25-5-2010 21:38:40 | 只看该作者
楼上的,这个不是官方说法啊
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 25-5-2010 21:47:34 | 只看该作者
原帖由 小小白虎 于 25-5-2010 21:38 发表
楼上的,这个不是官方说法啊


恩,我知道这不是官方..但这个人也是分析,代表当地的,所以,不是官方,也能看出点什么吧...哎...猜吧..娱乐吧...
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 25-5-2010 23:04:11 | 只看该作者
呵呵,谢谢lz分享。
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 3-8-2026 19:04 , Processed in 0.043152 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表