找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 1733|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

A MONOPOLY enjoyed by the English language test IELTS is likely to be broken up.

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 19-5-2010 15:12:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
Immigration and Citizenship Minister Chris Evans has given in-principle approval for rival tests to be officially recognised for checks of English proficiency when overseas students or workers seek visas.

"We're very hopeful. There's really no objective reason why TOEFL [the US-based Test of English as a Foreign Language] could not be confidently used in the Australian [immigration] context," said Eileen Tyson, a TOEFL representative in Australia this month for talks.

TOEFL, which dates back to 1964, and a new test from global publisher Pearson are known to have applied to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship for official status.

IELTS, the International English Language Testing System, which emerged from British and Australian collaboration, has had a monopoly since 2001 when the department mandated its test for student visas. It has also enjoyed a near monopoly for skilled migration. IELTS has struggled at times to keep up with the demand for its tests, leading to complaints about waiting times.

Helen Cook, who works with TOEFL in Australia, said insistence on IELTS by the department could be a disincentive for potential overseas students who had a TOEFL result for admission to an Australian university.

Reporting his 2009 study of overseas students who did not take up an offer, researcher Alan Olsen said: "Australia might need to look at why it does not accept TOEFL results for higher degree by research students from countries such as China, India and Iran."

In April 2008, education broker IDP Australia Pty Ltd paid $28.7 million to become sole owner of IELTS Australia Pty Ltd.

Four months later, the Immigration Department began a review of the IELTS monopoly by inviting other test providers to put their case for recognition. One estimate puts the worth of the Australian test market at about $30m, although this may be reduced by the government's decoupling of education and immigration.

Last month, Senator Evans wrote to TOEFL and other test providers to tell them of "his in-principle support for the acceptance of more than one English language test under the migration regulations", a department spokesman said.

There was some more work to be done on the security of tests, and on the equivalence of scores between different tests, before a final decision, the spokesman said.

如果以后真的toefl也能用的话。。大家认为多少等效4个7? 110?
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 19-5-2010 15:13:15 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 19-5-2010 15:41:23 | 只看该作者
T 并不比鸭子好烤吧
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 19-5-2010 15:48:57 | 只看该作者
雅思的腐败是系统性腐败,是从跟烂到头。
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 19-5-2010 17:31:09 | 只看该作者
tofle科学的多,客观的多
至少不把口语,作文无道理的绑定在一起
所谓4个7就是骗钱的
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 19-5-2010 22:21:46 | 只看该作者

多一个竞争者总是好事

而且如果急需英语成绩,也多一个考试可以抢时间。
请教一下krisphone, 为什么说雅思把口语,作文无道理的绑定在一起呢?
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
 楼主| 发表于 20-5-2010 00:01:26 | 只看该作者
我感觉好处就是toefl的写作和口语不像雅思这么压分,不会像雅思这么不给4个7.。。。
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 21-5-2010 00:11:39 | 只看该作者
好消息!
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 5-8-2026 18:57 , Processed in 0.015918 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表