|
|
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言
另一个论坛上转来的,大家参考一下:
移民法部分内容:意思就是如果那已经lodge的人开刀,是合法的
作者:TtiGeR
Determination of applicant's score
(1) The Minister shall make an assessment by giving the applicant the prescribed number of points for each prescribed qualification that is satisfied in relation to the applicant.
(2) In this section:
"prescribed" means prescribed by regulations in force at the time the assessment is made. 【审理时生效的法律为准,而不是以申请时的法律为准】
SECT 94
Initial application of "points" system
(1) An applicant whose assessed score is more than or equal to the applicable pass mark at the time when the score is assessed is taken to have received the qualifying score.
"assessed score" , in relation to an applicant for a visa, means the total number of points given to the applicant in an assessment under section 93.
"applicable pass mark" , in relation to a visa of a particular class, means the number of points specified as the pass mark for that class in a notice, under section 96, in force at the time concerned.
SECT 96
Minister may set pool mark and pass mark
(1) The Minister may, from time to time, by notice in the Gazette , specify, in relation to a class of visas, the pool mark for the purposes of this Act and the regulations.
(2) The Minister may, from time to time, by notice in the Gazette , specify, in relation to applications for visas of a particular class, the pass mark for the purposes of this Act and the regulations.
(3) A notice under subsection (1) or (2) operates to revoke the previous notice under that subsection in relation to the same class of visas and also operates as a variation of the mark specified in the previous notice.
(4) The Minister shall cause copies of each notice under subsection (1) or (2) to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the publication of the notice in the Gazette .
(5) This Act does not prevent a pool mark and a pass mark from being equal.
(6) This Act does not prevent a pool mark and a pass mark from being varied independently of each other.
简单来说
就是以assess你的时候,也就是审理时的法律规定所规定的适用于你的评分标准和分数线计算。
尽管,历史上,REGULATION都做了过度安排,写了“某某年某月某日到某某年某月某日期间的申请,按照SCHEDULE xx的评分标准计算”,“某某年某月某日起的申请,按照最新的标准SCHEDULE ***计算”。
但是,法律本身并不要求Regulation做出过度安排,也就是说,完全可以没有过度,一刀切,修改评分标准,修改分数线。
举例来说:
假设明年3月1日出了新政策,调整了分数线和计分标准。
a) 如果政府决定实行过渡政策,到时候的Regulation会这么写:
200x年x月x日到2007年8月31日期间递交的申请,按照SCHEDULE x的评分标准和分数线;
2007年9月1日到2010年2月28日期间递交的申请,按照SCHEDULE xx的评分标准和分数线;
2010年3月1日起递交的申请,按照SCHEDULE ***x的评分标准和分数线。
b) 如果政府决定一刀切,到时候Regulation就会这么些:
申请人的评分标准和分数线,以SCHEDULE ***x为准。 |
|