情感天空 今日: 0|主题: 1231|排名: 34 

最后发表： 果仁1212
回复内容：
优秀的女人才会剩下来。祝福早日心想事成。

最后发表： wuyeqw
回复内容：
嘿嘿，我这个人比较折中
我觉得，对什么人说什么话，这点很重要
另外，分清谁是刀子心谁是豆腐心也很重要，但是，这点很难

最后发表： xiangaidimao
回复内容：
…………我还记得那个“西安盖地猫”………………

最后发表： SydneySky
回复内容：
,楼主的旅历是要赞的，我也喜欢折腾。。。。

最后发表： annyfs
回复内容：
很赞同这个做法，但一旦钱到手的时候是否会改变主意呢？
淡定！

最后发表： 马来西亚的gay
回复内容：
I can understand this idea
My cabinet of freedom and happiness.
Is a devastating injury gave birth to my upbringing to two [[parents]].
Love their parents - then I have to worry about a lot.
So I chose, and LES-shaped wedding








I can understand this idea
My cabinet of freedom and happiness.
Is a devastating injury gave birth to my upbringing to two [[parents]].
Love their parents - then I have to worry about a lot.
So I chose, and LES-shaped wedding






我能理解这种想法
我出柜的自由幸福
是毁灭性伤害孕育我养育我到大两个人[[父母]]。
爱父母——那么我就得顾虑很多。
所以我选择和LES形婚
问题是我不知道怎么在马来西亚找一个les 形婚
希望你们能理解我不混圈子，但我下决心找到形婚

最后发表： 马来西亚的gay
回复内容：
我能理解这种想法
我出柜的自由幸福
是毁灭性伤害孕育我养育我到大两个人[[父母]]。
爱父母——那么我就得顾虑很多。
所以我选择和LES形婚

最后发表： Kingfisher
回复内容：
that's always true in SYD, never has enough gentlmen....

最后发表： ariesbunny
回复内容：
怕偷渡？怕出去干坏事儿？还是借机捞点儿啥？

山高皇帝远的，都是自己立的山头。

最后发表： 马来西亚的gay
回复内容：
我是个失败者！你呢！屎脑！满咀说的都是屁话！你是否菊花长在咀巴上！

最后发表： 在YM路上
回复内容：
呵呵，祝MM一切顺利。

最后发表： NEWGAY
回复内容：
第二条是喝药不夺瓶，上吊就给绳

最后发表： nicoleflopy
回复内容：
强奸眼球。。。。有碍市容

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
　据纽约时报报道，奥巴马政府周五称限制军队同性恋伴侣权利的法规是违宪的，认为
军人的同性伴侣应当享有与异性恋伴侣同等的权利，如到军队医院探访，伤亡抚恤，军
队公墓共葬等。　司法部律师埃瑞克.H.小霍尔德在给白宫发言人约翰.A.伯纳的一封信
中提到，司法部在麻省一个诉讼案中持有的观点与原告相同，即婚姻保护法案、因性取
向区别对待退伍军人等法规是违宪的。

　　霍尔德在近一年前宣布，司法部将停止支持婚姻法中有关禁止联邦承认美国各州同
性婚姻的合法化的条文。当时促使司法部声明的是一些相关民事诉讼，比如当配偶一方
死亡后，另一方需不需要支付遗产税。

　　共和党在一年前为了保住该条款特意组建了一个法律团队。对于司法部的最新举动
，他们也表达了不满，坚称司法部有义务维护联邦的法律法规。

　　奥巴马政府在周五表示其将继续推行军队同性伴侣相关法律，除非议会否决或法院
废除。霍尔德周五信中的观点与一年之前相同：那些区分对待同性恋伴侣与异性恋伴侣
权利的法律法规不能体现政府价值，并且违反宪法的平等保护的原则。

　　“那些保障退伍军人异性伴侣福利而却不能给那些合法的同性配偶同等福利的规定
是站不住脚的。”他写到，“司法部及退伍老兵事务部均强烈反对区分对待同性及异性
伴侣。”

©文稿版权所有，转载请注明出处“爱白网”。

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
Why gay marriage is inevitable

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-klarman-ga

With more openly gay people and strong support for same-sex unions among the
young, the war is over even as the fighting continues.

By Michael Klarman

February 12, 2012
The year 2012 is shaping up as a big one for same-sex marriage. Last week,
the Washington state Legislature passed a bill allowing gay marriage, and
legislatures in Maryland and New Jersey may follow suit shortly (though New
Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has promised a veto). North Carolina and
Minnesota are conducting referendums this year on constitutional amendments
to bar gay marriage, and Maine is likely to conduct a referendum on
legalizing it.

On Tuesday, the U.S. 9th Court of Appeals reminded us that courts too have
something to say on the subject. In a case challenging the constitutionality
of California's Proposition 8, that court ruled in favor of gay marriage.
Because its ruling was so narrow that it may not be applicable outside
California, theU.S. Supreme Court may decide not to review this decision.
Eventually, though, the Supreme Court will take a gay marriage case. How
might the justices decide it when they do?

As recently as seven or eight years ago, there might not have been a single
justice prepared to declare a federal constitutional right to same-sex
marriage. Opinion polls then showed that Americans opposed gay marriage by a
2-1 margin, and a Massachusetts court decision declaring a right to gay
marriage under the state constitution produced an enormous political
backlash in 2004, with 13 states enacting constitutional bans. Even liberal
justices such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg andStephen G. Breyer, who probably
sympathize with gay marriage, might well have been wary of venturing too far
in advance of public opinion and stoking further political backlash.

The situation has since changed dramatically. Opinion polls now consistently
show that a slender majority of Americans support gay marriage. State
supreme courts in California, Connecticut and Iowa have ruled in its favor,
and legislatures in five states have enacted gay-marriage statutes. If
liberal judges on state supreme courts now regularly support gay marriage,
liberal justices on the U.S. Supreme Court are likely to do so as well.

A number of constitutional issues today — abortion, affirmative action,
campaign finance reform and the death penalty — divide the Supreme Court 5
to 4, with Justice Anthony Kennedy providing the critical swing vote. How
might Kennedy approach the gay-marriage issue?

Kennedy often converts dominant social mores into constitutional commands to
bring outlier states into line with the majority. In this case, the states
that allow gay marriage are in a distinct minority, suggesting he might be
reluctant to identify such a constitutional right.

On the other hand, Kennedy has written the court's only two decisions
supporting gay rights, and he comes from a part of the country — Northern
California — where support for gay marriage is strong. Moreover, Kennedy
seems especially attuned to his historical legacy, and if gay marriage is
inevitable, then a court ruling in its favor will probably be seen one day
as the Brown vs. Board of Education of the gay rights movement.

Why is gay marriage inevitable? First, the basic insight of the gay rights
movement over the last four decades has proved powerfully correct: As more
gays and lesbians have come out of the closet, the social environment has
become more gay friendly. In turn, as the social environment has become more
hospitable, more gays and lesbians have felt free to come out of the closet
. This social dynamic is powerfully reinforcing and unlikely to be reversed.

One factor that most strongly predicts support for gay equality is knowing
someone who is gay. As more gays and lesbians come out of the closet, more
parents, children, siblings, friends, neighbors and co-workers know or love
someone who is gay. Because few people favor discrimination against those
they know and love, every gay person coming out of the closet creates more
supporters of gay equality.

The number of Americans reporting that they know somebody who is openly gay
tripled between 1985 and 2000, reaching 75%. One study in 2004 found that
among those who reported knowing someone who is gay, 65% favored either gay
marriage or civil unions, while only 35% of those who reported not knowing
any gay people supported them.

A second reason that gay marriage seems inevitable is that young people so
strongly support it. One study by political scientists found a gap of 44
percentage points between the oldest and youngest survey respondents in
their attitudes toward gay marriage. A 2011 poll found that 70% of those age
18 to 34 supported gay marriage. It is hard to imagine a scenario in which
young people's support for gay marriage dissipates as they grow older.

The trend in favor of gay marriage has accelerated dramatically in the last
three years. Before 2009, the annual rate of increase in support for gay
marriage was about 1.5 percentage points, but since then it has been closer
to 4 percentage points. Statistical models predict that in another dozen
years, every state will have a majority in favor of gay marriage.

In recent years, many conservatives have begun to acknowledge the
inevitability of gay marriage, even as they continue to strongly oppose it.
In March 2011, Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological
Seminary, said on a Christian radio program that "it is clear that something
like same-sex marriage … is going to become normalized, legalized and
recognized in the culture."

"It's time," he continued, "for Christians to start thinking about how we're
going to deal with that."

That a particular social change may be inevitable, given certain background
conditions, does not mean that opponents will cease fighting it. White
Southerners continued to massively resist Brown long after most of them came
to believe that school desegregation was inevitable.

Similarly, those who believe that gay marriage contravenes God's will are
not likely to stop fighting it simply because their prospects of success are
diminishing. Moreover, because religious conservatives are both intensely
opposed to gay marriage and highly mobilized politically, they are likely
for the next several years to continue exerting significant influence over
Republican politicians who need their support to win primary elections.

Although the ultimate outcome of the contest over gay marriage no longer
seems in doubt, plenty of fighting remains until that battle is over.

Michael J. Klarman is a professor at Harvard Law School and the author of "
Same-Sex Marriage Litigation and Political Backlash," to be published this
fall.

最后发表： choz
回复内容：
婚外情常有发生，但舒城男子胡某结婚5年多，都不知道自己的妻子竟然是个同性恋者，直到发现“第三者”是个女人才明白过来。日前，舒城法院受理了这样一起蹊跷的离婚案件。

办案法官介绍，立案的时候胡某只说妻子一年多没回家，夫妻关系名存实亡要求离婚，但在叙说原因时闪烁其词，在法官的劝说下，胡某才吞吞吐吐地说出事情的原委。

原来胡某和妻子在外地打工时认识，相爱之后于2006年结婚，结婚当年生下一女，随后二人又一同到外地打工。打工期间，胡某妻子认识了一名外地“女朋友”，并且和这位“女朋友”相约去外地游玩，后来又打电话回家，说要到“女朋友”的家乡去玩，胡某为妻子的安全着想没有同意，但妻子执意去了。

后来胡某将妻子找回家，从其手机中发现了很多她和“女朋友”的暧昧短信，细问之下妻子承认了自己的同性恋情，本以为妻子回来了一切都会过去，谁知过了几天，妻子借口去上海讨行李，从此一去不返。胡某无奈起诉离婚。（中安在线 胡锦峰 方荣刚）

最后发表： xblues
回复内容：
1 激进派：革命，这是比较激进的方法，目前还没听说过哪里有采用的。当然，反过来恐同对同性恋的迫害倒是屡见不鲜，比如伊朗对于同性恋处以绞刑，乌干达2009年则通过了那个灭绝同志的法律，世界各地都有同志被迫害，很多同志同少年由于受不了社会的迫害而选择结束自己的生命。我今天刚听说我的一个朋友差一点自杀了。看来同志不革命，革同志们命的人还是不少啊。

2 积极派：和平手段争取同志平等权益，采取这个方法的很多，著名的同性权益组织，还有很多同志活动家，他们通过各种演讲游行立法等各种手段积极推动同志运动。我已经参加了2次悉尼的同志大游行，今年5月份还有一次游行，Youtube上面有很多同志活动家演讲的视频。我很佩服这些同志活动家的智慧和付出。中国著名的同志活动家要数李银河教授莫属了。

3 名人效应：媒体人物和公众人物在同志运动中起到了不可忽略的作用。比如哥哥张国荣，美国的Ellen，还有其他一些橱柜的明星，他们通过自身的魅力去影响和感染，进而改变公众对同志的态度和认知。

4 大型公众活动：世界各地每年都有很多同志大游行，旧金山和悉尼每年的同志大游行是世界范围内最大的。每年都有数以万计的人参加。台北和新加坡也开始有了同志大游行。同志大游行展示同志们自豪的风采，既带来可观的经济效益，有让公众有了一个了解同性恋的窗口。我来澳洲三年每年都参见，今年更是进入了悉尼的同志游行队伍。

5 影视作品：专门的同志题材的影视作品还不多，不过很多电视剧集中都有同志伴侣或者涉及同志话题。影视作品的渗透作用不可小觑，虽然这种渗透属于温和的做法，需要很多年才逐渐见效，不过就目前看来这种方法，公众的接受程度最高。目前热播的美剧无一没有设计同志话题的。

6 普通人的现身说法：这一辈子永远藏在柜子里面，除了伤害自己并没有任何积极作用。勇敢大胆自豪的走出来，让公众了解同志们没有什么不一样。

最后发表： orientboy
回复内容：
顶一下吧。

最后发表： 准备中的小小盈
回复内容：
我也在AD啊，留个爪~

最后发表： 福运
回复内容：
特别佩服护理老人的人。真不是一般人干的来的。

最后发表： 菊花宝典
回复内容：
我个人的经历，说出来仅供参考：

我当Tutor的时候，辅导过很多中国留学生。我个人的感觉：所谓“富二代”，不管男孩女孩，大多心思单纯，乐于助人，对大陆同胞友善厚道；反观“非二代”们，则比例小得多。

个人观点，不喜勿喷。谢谢！

最后发表： 大杨树
回复内容：
女人胜过孩子才有魅力，实在养不起，就送人吧

最后发表： 冰翡翠
回复内容：
情商低的人好吗？？动不动就闹小脾气小别扭

最后发表： 冰翡翠
回复内容：
原来星星是有理想有目标的有为青年呐！恭喜恭喜！！

最后发表： CandyHood
回复内容：
mark 一个，谢谢分享。

最后发表： wkmqla
回复内容：
超过半数是打酱油的啊。。。。

最后发表： evergreen
回复内容：
LZ可以说我在那里工作啊，当教练滴

最后发表： 无业梅花
回复内容：
那个大兵像个小姑娘！很可爱滴说！

最后发表： 路过蜻蜓
回复内容：


正在听哥哥的歌，好想他啊

最后发表： p820931609
回复内容：
支持楼主。感谢发贴傲世九重天 www.luobop.com

最后发表： p820931609
回复内容：
要是在丰富点就好了 傲世九重天 www.luobop.com

最后发表： annyfs
回复内容：

最后发表： annyfs
回复内容：
我很赞同！选择单身，就是选择了担当，真男人！

最后发表： annyfs
回复内容：
哪一天中国人都能接受同性恋，文明又前进了一大步！

最后发表： alanclin
回复内容：
怎么独生子女都惯成这样了，非常不成熟，怪不得离婚率那么高。一点点小事就说分。

最后发表： 冰翡翠
回复内容：
没有任何理由可以让你的感情成为他的独奏，即使以爱的名义。

最后发表： 冰翡翠
回复内容：
利害！

最后发表： fatfish_ccc
回复内容：
就离个婚，还要找律师啊。。。

那点东东，需要啥，自己去法院讲讲估计就行了。

最后发表： extreme
回复内容：


你这样的论证对于文学作品来说，是不合适的。文学不是数理化，没有必要把所有论据都摆出来，然后才能推出结论，文学讲究的是心有灵犀，很多东西是不需要说透说全的，作者和读者彼此领会，那才是默契，像你这样，非要把所有前提假设论点论据一一道尽，那是数学推理，那不是文学，严密是严密了，但不觉得枯燥乏味吗？

最后发表： be2
回复内容：
come on, boys.