找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 3173|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[新技术交流] Ubuntu vs. OpenSolaris vs. FreeBSD Benchmarks

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 26-11-2008 19:02:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
在本月初测试了Mac OS X 10.5 vs.Ubuntu 8.10, Phoronix.com这次又带来了工作站操作系统性能测试。比较了Ubuntu 8.10、OpenSolaris 2008.11 RC2和FreeBSD 7.1 Beta 2,使用相同的测试工具Phoronix Test Suite,运行了Java,磁盘、压缩、解密加密等基准测试。最后结果,总体上64位版本的Ubuntu 8.10最快,但部分测试中FreeBSD和OpenSolaris都各有千秋。
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:05:31 | 只看该作者
Compression & Encoding: (Ubuntu > FreeBSD >= OpenSolaris)

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:06:47 | 只看该作者
File Encryption & File Write:

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:07:34 | 只看该作者
Java:

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图




回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:08:21 | 只看该作者
Java & OpenSSL:

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:09:06 | 只看该作者
Bonnie++ Disk:

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:10:09 | 只看该作者
BYTE Computational:

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

                               
登录/注册后可看大图




回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
 楼主| 发表于 26-11-2008 19:13:50 | 只看该作者
分析:from:http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=os_threeway_2008&num=8

In our LAME MP3 encoding test, Ubuntu 8.10 was the fastest followed by FreeBSD 7.1 Beta 2 and then OpenSolaris 2008.11 RC2. In the 7-Zip and Gzip compression tests, Ubuntu had led the way followed by OpenSolaris and then FreeBSD. In the GnuPG file encryption test, however, FreeBSD had overtook OpenSolaris for a second place finish. While a narrow escape, FreeBSD had over-powered Ubuntu in the PHP-driven Tandem [color=#234865 ! important][color=#234865 ! important]XML test, which led it to taking first place. Like the GnuPG test, there was a considerable difference in performance between Linux/FreeBSD and OpenSolaris.

With [color=#234865 ! important]Java and OpenSolaris being products of Sun Microsystems, it shouldn't be too surprising that the fastest Java performance was generally witnessed atop this Sun operating system. In the Bork file encryption test, OpenSolaris had a very strong lead over Ubuntu and FreeBSD. With the Java SciMark test created by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, OpenSolaris exhibited the best FFT and Monte Carlo performance. Ubuntu managed to take a close lead in the Sparse Matrix Multiply performance for Java SciMark and then the SOR performance was too close to call between the three test [color=#234865 ! important]operating systems
. The last Java-powered test was the Sunflow Global Illumination Rendering System, which is built around a ray-tracing core. Here the best performance was found on FreeBSD 7.1 Beta 2.

For some file-system/disk-centric testing we had used Bonnie++ with the sequential create, random read, and random delete modes. In all three of the tests, OpenSolaris 2008.11 was the champion and had trenched its competition. However, it's important to reiterate that all three operating systems were left in their stock configurations and that no additional tweaking had occurred. The performance differences between EXT3, UFS, and ZFS are clear.
The last area we tested with the Phoronix Test Suite was the BYTE [color=#234865 ! important][color=#234865 ! important]Unix Benchmark to gauge its Dhrystone 2, register arithmetic, and floating-point performance. FreeBSD had a considerable lead with Dhrystone 2, but at register arithmetic, OpenSolaris managed a slight lead, and finally in the floating-point performance Ubuntu had a slight lead over FreeBSD.

If simply counting which operating system was in first place most frequently, it would be Ubuntu. Ubuntu 8.10 x86_64 was in first place eight times, OpenSolaris 2008.11 RC2 was in first place seven times, and FreeBSD 7.1 Beta 2 AMD64 was in first just three tests. Depending upon your system usage, one operating system may appear more favorable, like OpenSolaris with the greater disk performance. To reiterate though, all of the testing was done on a single workstation-oriented system with dual quad-core [color=#234865 ! important][color=#234865 ! important]processors and 4GB of RAM. FreeBSD and OpenSolaris were also using their latest testing builds while Ubuntu was using a final release copy. We do plan, however, to deliver more operating systems benchmarks in the future to look at these final release versions on different hardware. Thanks to the Phoronix Test Suite, we could also throw in [color=#234865 ! important]Mac OS X
again and have a heated four-way comparison.
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 27-11-2008 10:44:58 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除, 无法发言
kubuntu还真好看,刚装上就发现不能设置静态地址,只好把networkmanager给卸了
回复  

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 27-11-2008 11:06:16 | 只看该作者
希望看到 Ubuntu 32 位和 64 位的比较
回复  

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 27-11-2008 11:43:13 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

12#
 楼主| 发表于 27-11-2008 11:45:06 | 只看该作者
AMD Phenom 32-bit vs. 64-bit Performance (ubuntu 8.04)

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php ... ;item=998&num=1
回复  

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 27-11-2008 11:46:24 | 只看该作者

回复 #11 coredump 的帖子

谢谢

都是解放前的数据了
回复  

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 27-11-2008 11:48:09 | 只看该作者

回复 #12 coredump 的帖子

Good

可惜没有 Java 的数据
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 5-9-2025 20:10 , Processed in 0.020412 second(s), 30 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表