工作学习 今日: 0|主题: 12101|排名: 5 

最后发表： zhangyuanzhi
回复内容：
纠结中。

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：
招几个人 还要招这么久？？？？？？

最后发表： wj22
回复内容：
工作有bonus吗?
% 以base salary的来算.

最后发表： zhangyuanzhi
回复内容：

这个是事实，我们有亲身体验。

最后发表： Venkey
回复内容：
据说墨尔本大学的图书管理员年薪九万澳币，所以竞争比较激烈，一时找不上也正常，LZ再接再厉！

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：
楼上正解

最后发表： guigua
回复内容：

Total TFN amounts withheld (Less any refuneded) 是0

最后发表： turnip_yun
回复内容：
学习了！

最后发表： panda57
回复内容：

另外hecs help 和 fee help 在贷款额度，免息还款方面有什么区别？
谢谢指导。

最后发表： 亚洲健身姐夫
回复内容：
是每人有5万美元的限制

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：
有那么重要吗？

最后发表： nicoleflopy
回复内容：

当然是后者了。。。

最后发表： kingsking
回复内容：
yeah..

now i am in Beijing...


Stock have big down, and i feel it should probably have a little little up..
perhaps..

things are changing..
all things are different.

最后发表： ozgeelong
回复内容：

税钱基本一分都不给退，无所谓啦

最后发表： DDD888
回复内容：

Me too

最后发表： nihaowohao
回复内容：

为了方便有需求的同学看到。

最后发表： 西澳海豚
回复内容：
Six Ways Obama Talks About War Without Saying “War”
Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2013/0 ... -war/#ixzz2er3d5EuI




The rousing rhetoric of a wartime speech is one thing. Trying to explain what the U.S. might do in Syria is quite another, a rhetorical puzzle that Obama’s administration has been trying to piece together for the war-weary American people. In six interviews last night, Obama walked a thin line trying to explain what, exactly, the U.S. should do when another country crosses a red line.

Here are six rules the President and many of his aides seem to be following when it comes to talking about war that isn’t war.

Don’t use the word “war,” of course.

There has long been a stockpile of euphemisms for actions or threats that involve making war, in the dictionary sense of “the employment of armed forces against a foreign power”: any necessary means, regime change, ultimate defense, humanitarian intervention, grave consequences—all options being on the table. In his interviews last night, Obama repeatedly referred to “military action” and even euphemized “military action” as “a significant piece of business” in an interview with PBS. “Everybody knows if you send in Tomahawk missiles and you’ve got the fleet sitting off the coast, those are war-like actions,” says Ken Khachigian, a former speechwriter for Nixon and the chief speechwriter for Reagan. Still, he says, “I wouldn’t say ‘we’re going to war’.”

Talk about what it is by saying what it isn’t.

Whatever the U.S. does in Syria, Obama reiterated last night, will not involve “boots on the ground.” It will not include “sustained airstrikes.” It will not amount to being involved in the “entire Syrian conflict.” The “sectarian civil way in Syria” is one thing, and what the U.S. does is another. He said America will not “embroil” itself. It will not be “long term.” And it will not be “costly.” This military action will not amount to “a military engagement” or “some large-scale invasion,” that would morph into a “slippery slope.” And it certainly wouldn’t be anything like other slippery slopes America has been trying to climb in the Middle East, he said, or “even Libya.”

Say the target is a group of things.   

Obama’s language suggested that the U.S., unlike Bashar Assad, would not really be taking action against human beings. A military strike in Syria is different than one in Iraq or Afghanistan, he implied, because this is a fight against the use of things. His plan is for the U.S. to strike “Assad’s capabilities,” to execute a “set of strikes to degrade his chemical weapons capabilities,” to “deal with this chemical weapons issue.” Our foes in his words are nouns that will never live or breath. “There’s a lot of clinical language that gets used when you’re speaking about the actions taken by your own side,” says former Clinton speechwriter Jeff Shesol. “Your language gets a little looser when you’re speaking about the other.”

Make it sound small.

Secretary of State John Kerry likely went too far yesterday when he said that military action would be “unbelievably small.” As Shesol says, “It starts to sound at a certain point like protesting too much.” But Obama used keywords last night to suggest that, if war was a duel to the death, military action in Syria will be more of a glove to the face demanding satisfaction. He used the word limited no fewer than 10 times, and words like narrow. He repeatedly used the word proportional. What exactly is proportional to a foreign leader’s use of chemical weapons on his own citizens is up for debate, but proportional action implicitly rules out widespread destruction or anything that would be big enough, in theory, to justify another round of retaliation.

Make it sound precise.

The word Obama used last night most often in reference to chemical weapons and why most all of humanity opposes them was indiscriminate. So he emphasized that military action taken by the U.S. would be the opposite of blind slaughter. It would instead be discriminate and “very specific” in a “targeted,” even “surgical,” way. When Obama wasn’t referring to military “action,” he referred to military “strikes,” which also sound much more distinct than bombings or even the use of missiles. Weapons are chaotic; a strike is like an organized bolt of lightning. “They really want people to understand how contained this operation is going to be,” says Shesol. “[A limited strike] sounds very clean. It sounds very technical.”

But make it sound serious.

When NBC’s Savannah Guthrie interviewed Obama yesterday, she said the notion of “limited and consequential” strikes seemed almost a contradiction in terms. But if the U.S. is taking action, Obama has to make it sound like that action will be big and bad enough not only to deter Assad from using chemical weapons and to avenge the death of Syrian innocents, but to dissuade all other malefactors in the world from ever using chemical weapons again. So Obama repeatedly emphasized that military action would be “significant,” and that “the U.S. does not do pinpricks”—even if the U.S. does do small, surgical, limited, targeted strikes against weaponry and other things.

最后发表： penfolds
回复内容：
本帖最后由 penfolds 于 14-9-2013 19:43 编辑


１０００刀。
尽快还贷，减少利息支出，是理财硬道理。

最后发表： yuzilu
回复内容：
本帖最后由 yuzilu 于 13-9-2013 20:05 编辑


前几年出租后几年自住的应该是partial CGT... 就是% = 出租的天数/总天数

请问后几年自住，有没有说必须要满足自住多少年的要求？

例如我在这十年里，只出租了1000天（自己也住，分租比例30%），那么交税的百分比=1000/3650*30%=8.2%，
请问是哪个计算公式正确：

          （700K-600K）*8.2%=8.2K

还是说（700K-600K）*50%*8.2%=4.1K？

最后发表： 春浅
回复内容：
在墨尔本的话最好就拿来给我看看吧
在下专业维修人士，在某公司售后服务中心的干活
楼主的问题:
1. 不开机风扇不转； 那肯定是不开机啦，引起不开的原因需诊断码卡再看看，目前可以做的就是1，电池放电，2，内存和内存槽清洁后重插，试试其他内存槽；
2. CPU 过热； 这个主要还是CPU散热的问题，IO和南桥也有可能；目前可以做的1.在CPU上加散热膏并确保风扇转；2，把你主板型号发出来看看，AMD的CPU容易过热，INTEL老的CPU也有这个问题
用热风枪拆拔IO是可行的，不过一般人手法不过关就不用尝试啦，拔内存槽不可行，南北桥和CPU这种肯定要专业机器的
类似电脑硬件问题也都可以站内咨询，大家多交流~

最后发表： 摄郎
回复内容：
  如果不是亲眼所见，我也不太相信。在洛杉矶，晚上路过一个超市，走到门前，门自动开了？进去一看，门边有人看守，他脚下有个踏板，同意你进就踩下，我们分析这是防抢措施。后来到了丹佛一个叫ARVADA的地方，感谢来自台湾的导游邱先生，在太阳下山前的半个小时，额外安排我们前往红石公园匆匆一游。因为同事要买奶粉，回来途中进了一个超市（面积大约4000平方）。可能天色已晚，超市没人，只有两个服务员在角落里聊天。门口摆着几辆（三轮或四轮）电动车，免费供残障人士使用。几十台结算机一字排开，商品自己拿自己结算。邱先生说：这里几乎没有中国人。我特地跑到门口去看有没有监控、磁条检测之类的，啥都没有。突然间冒出个想法，这离伊甸园多远？有点这个商场，让我见识了人家文明的高度。
我老婆说她以前看过美国关于自主结账超市的文章，一开始当地居民有些诧异，商场亏损。一段时间后账面反而溢出，白拿的人觉得羞愧补回来了。
我在健身房里说起自助超市，人家立马笑话我，说美国技术世界一流，监控很严密。有的说，那我在旁边开一间得了，不用进货。。。
  有个同学在俄勒冈，她说门口的电动车是行业工会的规定，必须的，不要把美国看得那么好。她们那的自助超市现在又雇人收费了，因为印度人、中国人慢慢多了

最后发表： 浮云云艾米莉
回复内容：
芝加哥居然在悉尼前面。。。冷的要死的地方。。。。。。

最后发表： Tiger_sha
回复内容：

这两个汇款没有其他中间费用的，

最后发表： dofach
回复内容：
欢迎交流。。。

最后发表： true
回复内容：
我报名表里说是PR了

最后发表： 教兽
回复内容：
你住在哪里？

最后发表： nicoleflopy
回复内容：
ubank？4.x

最后发表： 浮云云艾米莉
回复内容：
这么一说似乎想起，这个词确实似乎n年没用过了。。。

最后发表： phoebepiggy
回复内容：

嘿嘿好啊，能不能教我做咖啡啊！

最后发表： cais
回复内容：
谢谢各位的回复。可能是告诉我的那人自己也听错了。

最后发表： jishishuoai
回复内容：
好的 加上CPA在读 谢谢楼上！

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：
我还没到平均水平
资产都是银行的

最后发表： jgpyjwc
回复内容：

不能说是Claim回来
而是Income Deduction

最后发表： jgpyjwc
回复内容：
直接打断
我以前也想怎么和人聊天
时间长了 我想说就说   不想说就不说 没刻意滴

最后发表： spaceship
回复内容：
国内的话，一般半年或者一年都会有一次薪资评估，根据表现的好坏，可能会有加薪的机会。澳洲呢？会有哪些调薪机会呢？谢谢大家！

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：

没有吧,我觉得我说话很正常

最后发表： jishishuoai
回复内容：
恭喜！向前辈学习！

最后发表： DDD888
回复内容：
本帖最后由 DDD888 于 9-9-2013 08:17 编辑


那你具体会哪些技术啊?例如asp.net mvc, entity framework 等

最后发表： 唧唧歪歪
回复内容：
想起那句"名言"：...水平不知道比你们高到哪里去了，我跟它谈笑风生，你们啊，图样图森破。

最后发表： 浮云云艾米莉
回复内容：
要详细，但不要啰嗦。要准确的抓住keyword

有例子不？可以大家讨论下