工作学习 今日: 0|主题: 12104|排名: 48 

最后发表： 熊猫阿三
回复内容：
我想到的是夏天可以去里面乘凉！就是不知道怎么拿到wifi的密码

最后发表： 周星星1832
回复内容：
可是反过来，信用卡越多，额度越高，贷的款越少
其实你只要有份稳定的工作，比有信用卡更管用

最后发表： yanalxy
回复内容：

最后发表： rookie79
回复内容：

i appreicat ~

最后发表： 熊猫阿三
回复内容：
大部分客户也就是墨尔本悉尼吧....

最后发表： tailai99
回复内容：
这一点正是我们的问题，没有提前跟他打好招呼。他可能以为我们的货已经从国内发出来了，所以也没有问。唉...货物迟迟未能发出是因为国内的出口许可证的问题。

最后发表： skydome
回复内容：
中层往上还来做啥？
为孩子教育，为自己健康，理由与千百人一样。

不过，你体格强壮吗？20KG拿起来就跑？
体格自觉挺强壮，少年时学了点少林的活，现在在玩太极。20KG要看跑多远了！

那过来绝对能活，仓库工一大把空缺没人干呢！
仓库搬运工吗？

还懂建材？那体力好的话，在建筑装修行业混个体力活，钱也还可以。
建材算是比较懂，这个行业混了快二十年了。装修行业与建材行业是有点区别的，装修是乙方，我们干的是丙方。
说得也是，那天去和安装公司的老板聊聊。

若体力不行，那还是别来了。
体力不行就玩脑力，比如向鬼子宣传啥叫共产主义，顺便建个OZ共产党，保不齐竞选成了也不好说哦！

最后发表： dofach
回复内容：
有TFN就可以注册ABN。

最后发表： 小名
回复内容：
是新来的 。以后多多指教哈。

最后发表： jennymm070206
回复内容：
您说得很对，无论读书质量，学校排名和社会环境美国都优于澳洲，居我中介和新东方了解下来，在国内申请一般孩子能申请排名前100，在美国读高中孩子能申请前50，对我很有吸引力，但现在大量孩子去美国将来无论留在没还是回国竞争都很厉害，而我孩子只是有上进心，喜欢耍耍小聪明，读书不是很刻苦，学习和生活能力都一般的孩子，在国内也就考个普通重点，将来考个普通一本或二本，做父母的不甘心，总希望孩子更好，澳洲考虑有阿姨照看这，弥补下学习和生活能力不足，将来就业可能比美国容易些，如果找到专业工作，还有移民留下可能（去美国不报留下找工作希望），将来能过过普通日子，所以不是纠结好坏大学，而是在合适上纠结，希望有了解的朋友能给多给我些建议，谢谢了。

最后发表： morgan_ma
回复内容：

最后发表： jbcheng
回复内容：
多谢，我写信给她了，希望能有所帮助

最后发表： wuyeqw
回复内容：
联通速汇换，我去年回国时候在香港玩了几天
就在联通速汇换的，chinatown旁边就有
拿澳币现金去换，比银行汇率好多了，基本接近卖出价
没有假币
而且你换一次，就有你的资料了，以后换什么钱都很方便了

不是广告，仅供参考

最后发表： blackfencer
回复内容：


我们过去的邻居北方人，两口子白天在厂里打工，晚上回来在家里给人修车，小日子不错，这种有点手艺又不怕吃苦的最适合移民了。

最后发表： keane.li
回复内容：
记得给房子买保险，现在

最后发表： y2kgo
回复内容：
我哪知道啊
瞎蒙的啦

最后发表： cynthiawu
回复内容：
楼主看看，或许会有帮助

最后发表： 夏希劣ssb
回复内容：
８错８错，支持～～～






















最有效男士祛痘产品

最后发表： sex5521486
回复内容：
谢谢，你给的信息都是很有参考价值的，希望我们大家都继续努力，大家越来越好

最后发表： dxd008
回复内容：
经验不够的是不是可以考虑从内部顾问开始做起呢？

最后发表： melmel123
回复内容：
有人喜欢后院搞水上种菜吗？交流交流。

最后发表： 连城诀
回复内容：

最后发表： ginobilis
回复内容：
搭车求职  国内野鸡公司6年多JAVA经验

最后发表： 西澳海豚
回复内容：
口黏的LZ，沒人回覆你啊?

那我就野人獻曝，說一些我的想法~~不過可能是冷水居多。

我的背景是環境科學本科，在台灣念碩到一半，就移民到澳洲。

環境科學裡的科目，和數學有相當的關係，高等微積分-流體力學-統計-工程數學-有機無機化學-微生物-環境規劃管理-環境法規-生物生態學等等。

都是要學習的項目，即使當初我到澳洲，估計想重拾環境工程本行，進入大學念兩年研究所，重新學習澳洲環境法規管理與生態是免不了的。

或許你對環境科學有一些誤解，不是像一般人想像的到野外採採標本，研究室看看樣品這麼輕鬆，念起來也是很累人的。

尤其是你是文科出身，我只能說你要全部從頭學起，壓力不會是一般的小。

一般環境監測顧問公司的工作學歷要求至少是要本科，DIPLOMA可能就業的機會很小。

無論是哪一種性質的環境工作，對於科學寫作以及報告的要求很高，很像A類的亞斯作文，寫圖表分析數據等等。

薪水待遇一般，大學畢業大概5-6W年薪，工作機會是有的，找工難度在於個人程度，沒有辦法跟你說好找或是不好找~~

舉例來說，如果是研究當地生態(這事常常做，相信我)就是在野外住一周，設置200個捕鼠籠，每天徒步約20-30KM，然後把一隻隻的老鼠放進福馬林，帶回實驗室。或者是研究當地植物，也是野營徒步，採一堆植物標本，然後帶回來歸類-紀錄-登記-統計-分析-出報告。或者是在實驗室，玩著強酸強鹼，一不小心皮膚就被燒出一塊疤，或者是看著顯微鏡一整天------等等。

和你想像的不大一樣吧? 感興趣和真正當成職業一直做下去，是有很大的差別喔!!

我的習慣是先讓人看清楚事實，然後決定是交在你手上，YOUR LIFE，YOUR CHOICE。

最后发表： davidmouse
回复内容：
如果想从国内汇款到澳洲，请教下怎么办啊？大笔的，移民的话国家允许吗？

最后发表： 唧唧歪歪
回复内容：
澳大利亚元 619.18 600.07 624.16 624.16

最后发表： 大别山绿茶
回复内容：
如有需要大批量进口红酒至广东的，可联系我交流一下，我们可提供正常的红酒清关、保税及仓储服务。

最后发表： thewall
回复内容：
624.64

2011-11-24 00:00:04

最后发表： nz_wang
回复内容：
危机不是开始了吗, 而是结束了吗.

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips ... d-third-person.aspx

First, Second, and Third Person
You probably know what it means to write in first person, but you may not as confident about using second- or third- person point of view. Today, we are going to focus on each of these three points of view.

In grammatical terms, first, second and third person refer to personal pronouns. Each person has a different perspective, a point of view, and the three points of view have singular and plural forms as well as three cases form.

First Person
I the subjective case, the singular form of first person is “I,” and the plural form is “we.” “I” and “we” are in the subjective case because either one can be used as subject of a sentence. You constantly use these two pronouns when you refer to yourself and when you refer to yourself and others. Here’s a sentence containing both:
I look forward to my monthly book club meeting. We are currently reading Never Have Your Dog Stuffed by Alan Alda.

The first person of view is used primary for autobiographical writing, such as a personal essay or a memoir. Academics and journalist usually avoid the first person in their writing because doing so is believed to make the writing sound more objective; however, using an occasional “I” or “we” can be appreciate in formal papers and articles if a publication’s style allow it. Joseph M. Williams, author of Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace, agree: “…deleting an “I” or “we” does not make science objective; it makes reports of it only seem so. We know that behind those impersonal sentences are flesh-and-blood researchers doing, thinking and writing”.

I asked Sam to help me with my Happy New Year mailing, and we somehow got the project done early during the last week of December in spite of our packed schedules. I’m quite proud of us and ended up calling the projects ours instead of mine.

For the further clarification regarding the eight first-person pronouns just used, here’s a table: I/we, me/us, my/mine, our/ours

Second Person
You use the second point of view to address the reader, as I just did. The second person uses pronouns “you,” “your,” and “yours”. We use these three pronouns when addressing one, or more persons. Second person is often appreciate for e-mail message, presentations, and business and technical writing. Here are two examples with second-person point of view.
        Grandma,
        Before you go to London, remember to leave your keys under the doormat. I’ll miss you. Sincerely yours, Anna
        Class, you need to be in your seats when the principal arrives. Tom and Jerry, I’m speaking to you as well. By the way, are these comic books yours?

Third Person
The third person is the most common point of view used in fiction writing and is the traditional form in academic writing. Authors of novels and composers of papers use “he,” “she,” or “it” when referring to a person, place, thing, or idea. The following quotations include the third person singular subjective cases and are from the opening lines of three novels:
“Someone must have slandered Josef K., for one morning, without having done anything truly wrong, he was arrested”. “He” is in the singular third-person masculine subject case.
“Once upon a time, there was woman who discovered she had turned into the wrong person”. “She” is in the singular third-person feminine subjective case.
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” “It” is in the singular third-person neuter subjective case.

In addition to have a singular and plural case, you may have already noticed that the third-person has genders and a neuter category.

This is going to be quite mouthful of pronouns, but I’m trying to include all twelve singular third-person pronouns in only three sentences.
He met her at a conference where she was the keynote speaker, and it was odd to him that her laptop had a fountain pen sticker on it, because that was his favorite of pen. He had his with him and wondered about hers. “A laptop has its place on a desk or on a lap,” he thought, “but in the pocket near the heart and in the hand a fountain pen has its.”
That was a little awkward at the end, but there you have it – I mean them, all the pronouns. And now, before the last chart with third-person plural with the three cases, here is a short example with its four pronouns (Don’t write sentence like this; they’re impossible to understand!):
They gave them their gloves because theirs had holes in them.

A Reminder Regarding usage: Agree in Person
When you write in first-person, don’t confuse your reader by switching to the second person or the third person. Similarly, when using second or third person, don’t shift a different point of view. For example, here’s a sample that switches person in a confusing way:

I enrolled in a fiction-writing workshop for the winter quarter, and you have to complete three stories, each from a different point of view.

The pronouns in this sentence don’t agree with each other; the writer switched from first person to second person. Here’s the correct usage:

I enrolled in a fiction-writing workshop for the winter quarter, and I have to complete three stories, each from a different point of view.

Summary
So remember, simply stated, first person is from the writer’s point of view and uses pronouns such as “I”: I saw U2 at the Rose Bowl. Second person is directed at the reader and uses pronouns such as “you”: You saw U2 at the Rose Bowl. Third person is told from outside narrators point of view and uses pronouns such as “he,” “she,” and “it”: She saw U2 at the Rose Bowl.

最后发表： BOBOBA2011
回复内容：
道理很对，关键是执行的纪律，我觉得这才是根本，，

最后发表： Miki.Chen
回复内容：
太伤身体，这个没必要到tafe学的吧，看看就会。国内弄点材料才是真的。这边技术比国内差多了

最后发表： kk-11
回复内容：
谢谢

最后发表： wygehn
回复内容：
顶起来，支持楼主 顶~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






















怎么祛痘痕

最后发表： mate
回复内容：
(Sorry, Not vacant any more)

[ 本帖最后由 mate 于 12-12-2011 12:17 编辑 ]

最后发表： william_chang
回复内容：

那每个人不是从毕业开始的嘛？

最后发表： 插里
回复内容：
千万别买加油站，薄利，高风险。7-ELEVEN比较保险，关键看你多少钱接手了。

最后发表： wolf
回复内容：
对楼上无语了

最后发表： ranny.tang
回复内容：


谢谢oldestmonk的回复
我其实对法律职业还是蛮感兴趣的 最好能继续从事公司法相关事务
你的回复对我来说是好消息啊 ：）

律师在澳洲稳定吗？在国内做律师都得自己找案源，感觉很不稳定啊。或者您是指非诉律师吗？还是因为在澳，大家的法制观念强，所以律师的市场比较大？
要取得律师资格，得1.念LLM或JD，2.通过澳洲的bar exam,3.在律所实习 是吗？真是路漫漫啊。刚才在国内经历了这些，现在还要再经历一次。需要很大的勇气呢。

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/contractions.aspx

Contractions
A listener named Alex asked, “What’s the history of contraction in English usage? I just heard an interview with the Coen brothers about the movie true Grit. They point out that they were at the paint to avoid the use of contractions for an authentic 1860s American setting.”

The Coen brothers did say something like this. In a Newsweek interview, they were asked, “Did people actually not talk with contraction that time?” and they answered, “We’ve been told that the language and all that of formality is faithful to how people talked in period.”

The History of Contractions
Unfortunately, the Coen brothers were misinformed. Mark Liberman of the linguistic blog Language Log found the original True Grit novel by Charles Portis contains both contracted and uncontracted form. For comparison, however Liberman looked at two other novels, including Tom Sawyer, published in 1876, and found that those novels were more likely to include contraction than True Grit, so there’s really some contraction avoidance in the novel True Grit. May be Portis wrote that way for characterization, Liberman suggests. He also quoted a paper of Journal of English Linguistics on the history of contractions with “not.” It said that they first appeared in the writing at the beginning of the 17th century, increasing at the 18th, and more or less accepted in the 19th.

In fact, they were even contractions before 1600s, but at that time they usually weren’t indicated with an apostrophe, because the apostrophe was still a recent invention. Going back more than a thousand years, Old English has a class of contracted verbs. For example, the verb seon, “to see,” was a contraction of the earlier seohan. So contraction is not a recently development in English.

When to Use Contractions
In episode 201, we converted that most of contentious of contractions, “ain’t.” Our advice was
        In business, scholarly and other formal writing, omit “ain’t”, unless it’s used
in direct quotation, and never go around saying it in general conversation
unless it’s part of the joke or well-known saying. In dialogue or to convey a
vernacular tone in prose, use it with discretion. Treat it as spicy mustard;
don’t make a whole sandwich from it.
But why did “ain’t,” a potentially useful contraction that fills the gap where we could use a contraction of “am not,” come to be so disrespected? In Origins of the Specious, Patricia O’Conner and Stewart Kellerman wrote that “ain’t” was first used in place of both “am not” and “are not,” then for “is not,” and later, even for “has not” and “have not.” As O’Conner and Kellerman write: “’Ain’t’ claimed to have so many parents that it seemed illegitimate.”

In episode 168, we talked about respectable contractions that should nonetheless be used with care. Some are ambiguous. For example, when you read the “the dog’s,” It might be a possessive, as in “the dog’s tail”; it might be the contraction of “the dog is”; or it might be a contraction of “the dog has.” Usually the rest of the sentence will make it clear which you mean but not always, so it’s worth keeping the ambiguity in mind. For example, the sentence “I’d never run that fast” could mean “I had never run that fast” or “I would never run that fast.” Maybe the context will make it clear, but why not make it easier on the reader by writing out “I had” or “I would”?

Episode 168 also covered contraction of “have,” such as “would’ve”, “could’ve,” and “should’ve.” Whether you write these as contraction or two words, they still sound much the same as in everyday speech, so the contractions don’t save you any syllables. For that reason, our advice is to avoid them. All the more so for awkward double contractions such as “I’d’ve” and “it’ll’ve.”

Many Style Guides Recommend Using Contractions
You don’t have to avoid the contractions in all your writing. Many style guides even recommend using contractions. The Chicago Manual of Style says: Most type of writing benefit from the use of contractions. If used thoughtfully, contractions in prose sound natural and relaxed and make reading more enjoyable.

Brain Garner’s Modern American Usage advises:
The common fear is that using contractions can make the writing seem breezy. For most of us, thought, that risk is nil. What you gain should be a relaxed sincerity – not breeziness.

The federal government’s Plain Language website agrees with Garner, and adds:
“Write as you talk” is a common rule of writing readably, and the best way to do that is to use contractions. People are accustomed to hearing contractions in spoken English, and using them in your writing helps them related to your document.
Just Don’t Overdo It
So in short, use contraction in formal writing if it will sound stranger to avoid them than to use them. (If this advice sounds familiar, you might be remembering our episode on vulgar language, where we gave similar advice.) Of course, you don’t run the risk of offending your readers with contractions the way you wish swear words, but still, if you use any and all contractions just because you’re allowed to, your risk sounding awkward an distracting your readers, instead of making you writing easier to read – which is the whole point of using contractions in the first place!