老IT 快来看看！转滴答

wn1222

老it来看看怎么回事？这还有完吗？
Computing Professionals - ASCO-ANZSCO mapping
‘The MIA has received the following advice from the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC) General Skilled Migration (GSM) Program Director David Stewart:
DIAC [is] aware that there is a degree of confusion regarding the situation of GSM visa applicants whose skills were assessed by ACS as Computing Professionals NEC pre 1 July 2010. DIAC are discussing this issue with ACS and hope to resolve this matter in the not too distant future. DIAC's current advice is:

1.The following policy settings remain unchanged:
Applicants cannot change their nominated occupation; Computing Professional (NEC) in ASCO does not currently map to an ANZSCO occupation on Schedule 3.
2.Applicants can always submit new information to DIAC and if regulations allow it must be considered.
3.DIAC would not advise clients to get reassessed by ACS unless it is determined that Computing Prof NEC maps to occupations on Schedule 3.
4.If such a change were made DIAC would process applications generally in order of original date of lodgement and not date of "reassessment".
5.Any such change will be advised via www.immi.gov.au and GSM auto reply processing information mailboxes, Adelaide and Brisbane

yeats_only

我也很汗~~~

wn1222

顶下吧  IT的一起关注 没看到的及时了解！

vrwar

谁能解释下这啥意思，是说7.1前的2231-79还要重评？

koch

7.1后的,必须重评
7.1前的,不用重评,但是在G4
但是有很多不应该算到2231-79NEC里的开发人员,现在政策想 in the not too distant future 把这部分人归到G3来.
这部分人可能会让重评估.
总的来说,这是好事情吧.

新格咪咪

原帖由 koch 于 26-10-2010 13:03 发表

                               
登录/注册后可看大图

7.1后的,必须重评
7.1前的,不用重评,但是在G4
但是有很多不应该算到2231-79NEC里的开发人员,现在政策想 in the not too distant future 把这部分人归到G3来.
这部分人可能会让重评估.
总的来说,这是好事情吧.

我觉得7.1前的 有部分人都过期了 必须重评了 ~

krisphone

ACS 7.1前的有效期多久？一年？

wn1222

大家注意第三条 再发表下见解
3.DIAC would not advise clients to get reassessed by ACS unless it is determined that Computing Prof NEC maps to occupations on Schedule 3.

wn1222

我小白一下啊 我认为我这个没有在重新评估里吧 之前是2231-79（c#)，然后REVIEW 到软件工程师。再从新评估要评什么啊？