找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 2374|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

过户师代表买卖双方是否存在利益冲突?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 1-6-2009 21:46:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
如题, 假如过户师都代表买卖双方, 可行吗?

请大家赐教!  谢谢!
回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 1-6-2009 22:03:28 | 只看该作者
过户师??什么人?
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
 楼主| 发表于 1-6-2009 22:40:00 | 只看该作者

回复 #2 AnaCoppola 的帖子

过户师即办理房屋产权交割的专业人员.
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
发表于 1-6-2009 22:41:39 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 1-6-2009 22:46:59 | 只看该作者
Should the buyer and seller use the same conveyancer?

It is quite legal to use the same conveyancer and can often appear convenient to do so. However, the Institute (Australian Institute of Conveyancers) does not recommend doing so in most transactions. Remember that your conveyancer is there to work for you and be your advocate, not just stamp some forms and fill in the blanks. A conveyancer acting for both buyer and seller must cease to act if a conflict of interest arises (for example if the same advice cannot be given to both parties). Conflicts can arise over all sorts of issues such as a delayed settlement or unfulfilled special condition. It is generally impossible to predict when this may happen. The savings from using the same conveyancer are small but the risks are potentially huge. Significant delays often occur if the conveyancer must cease to act in a transaction. Ask yourself if you're really comfortable using the same person as the other party or if you would feel better working with your own conveyancer.

评分

参与人数 1威望 +10 收起 理由
Cool + 10 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 1-6-2009 22:47:30 | 只看该作者
Dual Representation

Many real estate agents have local conveyancers to whom they refer work from properties they are selling. This is perfectly appropriate if based on the professionalism and expertise of the conveyancer and can be helpful if you don't know of a conveyancer yourself.  The agent may tell you that it will be cheaper for you to use the seller’s conveyancer.  While it is legal for the buyer and seller to use the same conveyancer for the sale, the Australian Institute of Conveyancers does not recommend this practice.  In the long run, using the seller’s conveyancer could be much more expensive for you than having your own.

Your conveyancer should be your advocate in the conveyancing process and their goal should be to protect your interests. To avoid any conflict of interest it is advisable that you seek independent legal advice to that of the seller and vice versa. A conflict of interest for a conveyancer can be as simple as a delay in finance approval.

[ 本帖最后由 beckyzhou 于 2-6-2009 10:29 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 1-6-2009 22:48:54 | 只看该作者
总之,合法,但不推荐
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2-6-2009 09:14:52 | 只看该作者
原帖由 beckyzhou 于 1-6-2009 22:41 发表

conveyancer

汗。。。。原来是这个。。。
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2-6-2009 09:32:47 | 只看该作者
原帖由 AnaCoppola 于 2-6-2009 09:14 发表

汗。。。。原来是这个。。。

回复  

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2-6-2009 10:18:13 | 只看该作者
过户师!
回复  

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 2-6-2009 20:32:14 | 只看该作者
原帖由 beckyzhou 于 1-6-2009 20:47 发表
Dual Representation

Many real estate agents have local conveyancers to whom they refer work from properties they are selling. This is perfectly appropriate if based on the professionalism and exper ...


谢谢你提供的信息,看来我要再考虑找自己的conveyancer.
回复  

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 3-6-2009 21:20:45 | 只看该作者
最好不要, CONFLICT OF INTEREST. 你说他会维护谁的利益?
回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+10, 9-8-2026 22:29 , Processed in 0.019783 second(s), 29 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表