安家乐居 今日: 0|主题: 9729|排名: 11 

最后发表： oreokit
回复内容：
摸摸，什么时候到我家来我包饺子给你吃哈。

最后发表： unamedplayer
回复内容：


The developer already reaps years of cg from the buyer.

Also, if it is a large development, like those in rhodes in sydney, you have a large pressure on renting.

New apts usu have absurdly high strata, which hurts ur cf too.

However, seems lz is in china.

最后发表： 天煞孤星
回复内容：
发现一个建筑商评价网站。还没来得及细看。不知道怎么样。不过发现我以为还不错的National Group Builders居然还跟这个网站有法律纠纷（要求删除恶意留言）大家看看靠不靠谱
下面的链接是维州的，不过其他州也有评价的，找一下就行。
http://www.productreview.com.au/c/home-builders-vic.html

最后发表： keepdancing
回复内容：
嗯，有时风挺大的，用concrete tile还是有道理的

最后发表： 罗卜扛大包
回复内容：


关于这边孩子入学年龄，我还是一头雾水中。

是以6月31日之前满五周岁为准？我家孩子是6月头出生的，听朋友说这样算下来，她应该会比同年的孩子早入学至少半年，是这样吗？

最后发表： grace-zhou
回复内容：
我就是钢琴老师，有10几年教学经验。 在国内是音乐学院的钢琴老师，所教过的学生分别通过了各个级别的考级和音乐学院考试，熟悉澳洲钢琴考级，现在位置在Rowville ，墨尔本东南区。

最后发表： 无忧白菜
回复内容：
还有点担心孩子的学业是否能跟上，孩子在这边上幼儿园大班，可能要三四个月左右过去，听说那边孩子2月份已经该上小学了，孩子刚过去语言不通，又落下大半年课程，担心会吃力。

最后发表： 依然逍遥
回复内容：
在中国我有时也打不开，也只能上这个。http://www.domain.com.au

最后发表： 12729
回复内容：
房子盖好了吧，我记得去年这个时候儿子还在幼儿园大家给他过生日，今年就上学了，时间快啊

最后发表： 12729
回复内容：
基本上全了，衣服我们没准备多少，一是小孩长的很快，没穿几天就小了，另外亲戚朋友一般都送衣服，还有捡别人留下的，就够了，倒是那些设备要准备一下，我们当时就没准备个吸奶器，后来买个手动的，没几天我老婆就腱鞘炎了，奶水几个小时不吃就要吸出来，否则容易乳腺炎，还有就是温奶器，后来买了一个很好用，定好温度随时可以喝，省很多事

最后发表： 独立小桥风满袖
回复内容：

大包你又来馋我们了
小心后果很严重滴
我们一家四口会立马杀到你家蹭饭吃

最后发表： alanrrll
回复内容：
小区最新图片





[ 本帖最后由 alanrrll 于 10-3-2011 21:29 编辑 ]

最后发表： 羽天十三
回复内容：
悉尼是不用去领的，打个电话报个地址就行了，直接寄到家里。
布市应该也差不多吧。

最后发表： wangyusd
回复内容：
关注ing

最后发表： honggezi
回复内容：
研究中， 谢谢分享

最后发表： xyouc
回复内容：
应该要通知物业的吧。除非你是house或者duplex

最后发表： quickfire1979
回复内容：



恩恩。谢谢

最后发表： Alicemum
回复内容：
我是住在scoresby的，settle一个月了，目前对这个区各方面都比较满意，越住越喜欢吧，是个老区，安静，环境嘛，怎么说呢，跟rowvile比吧，院子里种着同样的树，rowvile的会打理的很漂亮，可是这里的邻居们就不怎么做园艺了，所以家家的院子看起来都很一般，不像rowvile那么养眼了，但可以接受了，大概就因为这点吧，房价还不是太高，很难得，走路6-7分钟到个小的shoppingtown，2家中国店，一家woolworths，生活很方便，但是房源不多，lz有心要盯住了，前两天一个house刚open不到2个星期就sold了，预算如果45k的话只能买个unit，就算lucky买到house也不会很爽了，50k的话house应该比较舒服，还要看具体情况，邻居的4房一卫是52.5k成交的，我们的就低于50，都是700多的地，lz选这几个区是比较实际的，房价应该这里相对贵一些吧，离city的距离也是最近，呵呵，也在25公里线外了，用我老公的话说ferntree那是山上，另外几个要偏一些，价钱也会便宜些，都看看吧，一切皆有可能，呵呵。

最后发表： chlily
回复内容：
如果你买million的房子，这些选项都不是问题，你还有时间考虑。否则你还得出手要快，没办法面面俱到。

最后发表： 羽天十三
回复内容：
我女儿两岁，你带去给你儿子做伴吧。
我和老婆在家过几天二人世界。

最后发表： bestxiao5
回复内容：
白痴问题，呵呵，刚开始看呐

最后发表： gentleboy
回复内容：
。。在brisbane倒是可以给你推荐一下

最后发表： emily.li
回复内容：
有哪位知道BOXHILL附近有没有好的牙医，给小孩子看的，最好能讲中文的。谢谢！

最后发表： nicoleflopy
回复内容：
恩，对的！

[ 本帖最后由 nicoleflopy 于 10-5-2011 14:28 编辑 ]

最后发表： hbczds
回复内容：
别拿中国速度估计澳洲发展，那是相当的不一样呀！

最后发表： life2.0
回复内容：


同问，谢谢

最后发表： mason00
回复内容：
我想不用，小孩子英语学得快，倒是我自己，要多准备英语了

最后发表： 2late
回复内容：
首页？翻页？

还在首页啊。水力你太搞笑了！

最后发表： evergreen
回复内容：
竟然还有这种事，闻所未闻，学习了

最后发表： Margaret
回复内容：
西人律师查尔斯， 叁拾余年工作经验， 专理房屋生意买卖，建立修改遗嘱等。 诚信可靠， 热心服务华人。电话（英）０２－９６６４５９５５；0425281458, (中)０４２５271509.
e-mail: charfa8@yahoo.com.au

最后发表： MillerYang
回复内容：
Ibrahim family。。。

最近新闻里经常出现

最后发表： 自游自在
回复内容：
刚完工,照片新鲜出炉

[ 本帖最后由 自游自在 于 5-3-2011 18:37 编辑 ]

最后发表： unamedplayer
回复内容：
(650k, 750k)

最后发表： d.c.world
回复内容：

哎，你早说啊，我带你们过去了，我现在反正也没事，闲得慌，下次再买我带你们去。

最后发表： zxart
回复内容：
我在悉尼，请问你买的是什么牌子？

最后发表： silky
回复内容：
楼上好专业哦！

最后发表： 阿土伯
回复内容：
Iron, coal, bricks and mortar

Mar 1st 2011, 11:06 by S.C. | HONG KONG

    *
    *

IT PAYS to pick your drinking buddies carefully. It's nice if they enjoy a pint as much as you do. But if they hold their liquor too well, you may wake up regretting trying to keep up with them.

In the years before the financial crisis, Australia's economy set a hard, fast pace for the rest of the Anglo-Saxon world. Its house prices rose faster than Britain's or America's (although Ireland's outstripped them all) and its current-account deficit gaped wider for longer. But its economy proved strong-livered. House prices fell from  March 2008 to March 2009 (as measured by the weighted average of the eight state capitals), then resumed their rise. In the year to the first quarter of 2010, they jumped by 18.8%!

This week in The Economist we will publish our quarterly index of house prices around the world. Australia's homes are the most overvalued in the index. The ratio of prices to rents in the country is fully 56% above its long-run average (see chart).

Australia's overvalued housesThe question now is whether Australia's hair of the dog treatment will work, or whether the property market will suffer another bite. Yesterday the RP Data-Rismark index showed prices rising by just 1.2% in the year to January. Compared with the previous month, they fell by 1.6%.

Many economists in Australia argue that the country's lofty property prices are justfied by a variety of fundamentals. Immigration has swelled the population, and zoning regulations, infrastructure charges and the like have imposed artificial constraints on the availability of land. (I must confess that I smile when I read about land scarcity in Australia. I am writing this from the 60th floor of an office tower in one of the most crowded places in the world. If Australia were as densely populated as Hong Kong, it could accommodate all of the world's people seven times over.)

These fundamentals no doubt matter. But one of the virtues of a price-to-rent ratio is that it takes them into account. If immigration is putting upward pressure on house prices, it should put upward pressure on rents too. And if developers can't build homes, they can't build rental homes either. Those factors may justify high prices. They don't justify high price-to-rent ratios.

The difficulty in using these ratios (or any other) as a measure of overvaluation is knowing what the ratio should be—what counts as an equilibrium? In our house-price index we take a simple historical average from 1975 to 2010. But perhaps something has changed in Australia in that time that now warrants a higher ratio. The chart above is certainly suggestive of some kind of structural break after 2000*. If you compare today's price-to-rent ratio with its average over the past ten years, it is overvalued by 12%, not 56%. Compared with its five-year average, it is overvalued by just 3%.

If things are different now, why might that be? Low interest rates and financial liberalisation is one answer. But Ireland, Britain and America enjoyed those too. What marks Australia out of course is its extraordinary resource boom. The country's terms of trade (the price it can fetch for its exports, relative to the price it pays for its imports) is at its highest since the 1950s (see chart). So perhaps lucrative exports of iron and coal justify rich valuations for bricks and mortar?

In a recent paper, Patrizia Tumbarello and Shengzu Wang of the  IMF show that a 10% improvement in the terms of trade tends to lift Australian property prices by about 5%. What they don't investigate is whether it raises the ratio of prices to rents. I think it's at least possible that a resource boom affects asset prices, like houses, differently from the price of a service, like rental accommodation. The bright prospects in mining and minerals will attract capital inflows into the resource sector, which might bid up the price of other assets in the economy. And in buying a house, the average Australian might see a way to crystallise the future income he expects will trickle down to him from the commodities boom.

Thanks to the improvement in the terms of trade, the average Australian's expected lifetime wealth has increased. In theory, he should be able to enjoy some of that windfall in the present, by borrowing against his future gains. But his bank might prefer it if he borrows to buy a concrete, collaterisable house instead. That way, he can either withdraw housing equity, if he wants to consume his future earnings, or accumulate it, if he wants to save them.

It's a bit like lining your stomach, before you go out drinking.

*Only suggestive. Charts for Ireland before the crisis looked very similar.

最后发表： xitucheng
回复内容：
交通方便吗？

是华人聚集区还是西人聚集区呢？

会受到附近的那个机场的影响吗？

最后发表： 羽天十三
回复内容：

正常，每个人口味都不嘛。

最后发表： 罗卜扛大包
回复内容：
有可能楼主在做两手准备呢

比如公立医院离住家比较近，虽然有私人保险，但是设想万一生产临时发作或者路途塞车等情况出现，或许也就只有就近选择先进公立医院。