找回密码
 FreeOZ用户注册
查看: 6453|回复: 50
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新移民法公布,TAFE重磅,以及境内申请必须等获评估结果后

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:44:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?FreeOZ用户注册

x
刚才得到澳大利亚留学网首席顾问Victor的通知,新移民法已公布,TAFE必须重新申请职业评估

provide that an applicant for an onshore GSM visa who nominates an occupation which is a identified “trade occupation” specified by the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship in an instrument in writing, would be required to obtain a new skills assessment after 1 January 2010

另外,明年起,境内申请必须在获得职业评估结果后才能递交(485除外)。(目前政策:境内申请,只要递交了职业评估申请就可以递交GSM申请了。)

provide that an applicant for an onshore General Skilled Migration visa (GSM visa) subclass must have a suitable skills assessment to satisfy the Schedule 1 requirement for the prescribed visa subclasses (Schedule 849 to the Principal Regulations refers);

These amendments provide that all applicants, with the exception of an applicant for a
Subclass 485 (Skilled – Graduate) visa must have been assessed as holding suitable skills for
the nominated skilled occupation prior to lodging an application for a Skilled (Provisional)
(Class VC) visa. This would ensure that a consistent standard of skills and competencies are
held by all applicants for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa. These amendments would
also provide that applicants who nominate a skilled occupation specified by the Minister in an
instrument in writing, must have had their skills assessed as suitable by the relevant assessing
authority on or after 1 January 2010.

[ 本帖最后由 TtiGeR 于 17-12-2009 02:09 编辑 ]

评分

参与人数 7威望 +155 收起 理由
yyhmm188 + 10 谢谢分享!
超级小懒 + 20 谢谢分享!
babyjean + 20 精品文章
helloworld1 + 20 谢谢分享!
stellahie + 20 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

2#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:46:55 | 只看该作者

回复 #1 TtiGeR 的帖子

那么CSL相关呢?MODL相关的也已经敲定了吗?

这么迅速

[ 本帖最后由 MillerYang 于 16-12-2009 22:49 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

3#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:47:37 | 只看该作者
也就是只是针对on shore 的TAFE有影响?
回复  

使用道具 举报

4#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 01:50:08 | 只看该作者
节选

This regulation provides that the title of the Regulations is the Migration Amendment
Regulations 2009 (No. 15)

This item inserts a new paragraphs 1136(3)(ba) and (bb) in item 1136 of Schedule 1 to the
Principal Regulations.

New paragraph 1136(3)(ba) prescribes a new validity requirement, which provides that an
applicant for a Skilled (Residence) (Class VB) visa must have had their skills assessed by the
relevant assessing authority as suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
New subparagraph 1136(3)(ba)(i) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who is not seeking to satisfy the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 887
(Skilled – Regional) visa.
New subparagraph 1136(3)(ba)(ii) provides that the new validity requirement does not apply
to an applicant who has nominated a skilled occupation which has been specified by the
Minister in an instrument in writing for paragraph 1136(3)(bb).
The effect of the new paragraph is to provide that an applicant who is seeking the grant of
either a Subclass 885 (Skilled – Independent) visa or a Subclass 886 (Skilled – Sponsored)
visa, who nominates an occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for
paragraph 1136(3)(bb) will be required to have had their skills assessed by the relevant
assessing authority as suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
The new paragraph provides an exception for an applicant who is seeking the criteria for the
grant of a Subclass 887 (Skilled – Regional) visa. Currently applicants seeking the grant of a
Subclass 887 (Skilled – Regional) visa are not required to have their skills assessed by the
relevant assessing authority as suitable. This is because it is a validity requirement for an
applicant seeking the grant of a Subclass 887 (Skilled – Regional) visa to be the holder of
either a Subclass 475 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored) visa or a Subclass 487 (Skilled –
Regional Sponsored). Both the Subclass 475 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored) visa and the
Subclass 487 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored) visa, require an applicant to have had their
skills assessed by the relevant assessing authority as suitable for the applicant’s nominated
skilled occupation to be eligible for the grant of the visa.
New paragraph 1136(3)(bb) prescribes a new validity requirement that an applicant who
nominates a skilled occupation, which is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing
for the purposes of this paragraph must have been assessed by the relevant assessing
authority, on or after 1 January 2010 as suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled
occupation.
New subparagraph 1136(3)(bb)(i) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who is not seeking to satisfy the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 887 (Skilled –
Regional) visa.
New subparagraph 1136(3)(bb)(ii) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who nominates a skilled occupation, which is specified by the Minister in an
instrument in writing for the paragraph.
These amendments provide that all applicants, with the exception of an applicant for a
Subclass 887 (Skilled – Regional) visa, have been assessed as holding suitable skills for the
nominated skilled occupation prior to lodging an application for a Skilled (Residence) (Class
VB) visa. This would ensure that a consistent standard of skills and competencies are held by
all applicants for a Skilled (Residence) (Class VB) visa. The amendments would also
provide that applicants, who nominate a skilled occupation specified by the Minister in an
instrument in writing, must have had their skills assessed as suitable by the relevant assessing
authority on or after 1 January 2010.
Item [2] – Schedule 1, after paragraph 1229(3)(a)
This item inserts new paragraphs 1229(3)(aa) and (ab) in item 1229 of Schedule 1 to the
Principal Regulations.
New paragraph 1229(3)(aa) prescribes a new validity requirement, which provides an
applicant for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa must have had their skills assessed by
the relevant assessing authority as suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
New subparagraph 1229(3)(aa)(i) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who is not seeking to satisfy the criteria for the grant of a Subclass 485 (Skilled –
Graduate) visa.
New subparagraph 1229(3)(aa)(ii) provides that the new validity requirement does not apply
to an applicant who has nominated a skilled occupation which has been specified by the
Minister in an instrument in writing for paragraph 1229(3)(ab).
The effect of the new paragraph is to provide that an applicant who is seeking to satisfy the
criteria for the grant of a Subclass 487 (Skilled – Regional Sponsored) visa who nominates an
occupation specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for paragraph 1229(3)(ab)
will be required to have had their skills assessed by the relevant assessing authority as
suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation. The exception to the new validity
requirement is intended to allow applicants seeking the grant of a Subclass 485 (Skilled –
Graduate) visa adequate time to meet the relevant criteria for a permanent GSM visa.
New paragraph 1229(3)(ab) prescribes that an applicant who nominates a skilled occupation,
which is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for the purposes of this
paragraph must have been assessed by the relevant assessing authority, on or after
1 January 2010 as suitable for the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
New subparagraph 1229(3)(ab)(i) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who is not seeking to satisfy the criteria for the grant of a
Subclass 485 (Skilled – Graduate) visa.
New subparagraph 1229(3)(ab)(ii) provides that the new validity requirement applies to an
applicant who nominates a skilled occupation, which is specified by the Minister in an
instrument in writing for the paragraph.
These amendments provide that all applicants, with the exception of an applicant for a
Subclass 485 (Skilled – Graduate) visa must have been assessed as holding suitable skills for
the nominated skilled occupation prior to lodging an application for a Skilled (Provisional)
(Class VC) visa. This would ensure that a consistent standard of skills and competencies are
held by all applicants for a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa. These amendments would
also provide that applicants who nominate a skilled occupation specified by the Minister in an
instrument in writing, must have had their skills assessed as suitable by the relevant assessing
authority on or after 1 January 2010.

Item [3] – Schedule 2, clause 175.211
This item substitutes clause 175.211 with new clause 175.211 in Part 175 of Schedule 2 to the
Principal Regulations.
New subclause 175.211(1) provides that in circumstances where the applicant has nominated
a skilled occupation which is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this
subclause, the applicant must have been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24
months immediately prior to the day on which the application was made.
This amendment provides that applicants who nominate a skilled occupation, which has been
specified by the Minister, must have been employed in the nominated skilled occupation for
at least 12 months in the preceding 24 month period prior to making an application for a
Subclass 175 (Skilled – Independent) visa. This will ensure that applicants for a Subclass
175 (Skilled – Independent) visa, who have nominated a specified skilled occupation hold
relevant up-to-date practical experience in their nominated occupation.
New subclause 175.211(2) provides that an applicant who has not nominated a skilled
occupation described in subclause 175.211(1) must have satisfied either of the following:
􀂃 been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24 months immediately prior to
the day on which the application was made; or
􀂃 satisfied the Australian study requirement in the period of six months ending
immediately prior to the day on which the application was made; and
􀂃 each degree, diploma or trade qualification used to satisfy the Australian study
requirement is closely related to the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
This amendment preserves the current requirement for an applicant for a
Subclass 175 (Skilled – Independent) visa to have either been employed for 12 months in the
preceding 24 month period prior to lodging an application or to have satisfied the Australian
study requirement, using a degree, diploma or trade qualification, which is closely related to
the applicant’s skilled nominated occupation, in the six months prior to lodging an
application.
Item [4] – Schedule 2, clause 176.211
This item substitutes clause 176.211 with new clause 176.211 in Part 176 of Schedule 2 to the
Principal Regulations.
New subclause 176.211(1) provides that in circumstances where the applicant has nominated
a skilled occupation which is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this
subclause, the applicant must have been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24
months immediately prior to the day on which the application was made.
This amendment provides that applicants who nominate a prescribed skilled occupation,
which has been specified by the Minister, must have been employed in the nominated skilled
occupation for at least 12 months in the preceding 24 month period prior to making an
application for a Subclass 176 (Skilled – Sponsored) visa. This will ensure that applicants for
a Subclass 176 (Skilled – Sponsored) visa, who have nominated a specified skilled
occupation hold relevant up-to-date practical experience in their nominated occupation.

New subclause 176.221(2) provides that an applicant who has not nominated a skilled
occupation described in subclause 176.211(1) must have satisfied either of the following:
􀂃 been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24 months immediately prior to
the day on which the application was made; or
􀂃 satisfied the Australian study requirement in the period of six months ending
immediately prior to the day on which the application was made; and
􀂃 each degree, diploma or trade qualification used to satisfy the Australian study
requirement is closely related to the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.
This amendment preserves the current requirement for an applicant for a
Subclass 176 (Skilled – Sponsored) visa to have either been employed for 12 months in the
preceding 24 month period prior to lodging an application or to have satisfied the Australian
study requirement, using a degree, diploma or trade qualification, which is closely related to
the applicant’s skilled nominated occupation, in the six months prior to lodging an
application.
回复  

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 01:50:57 | 只看该作者
回复  

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:54:03 | 只看该作者
麻烦tiger兄给大家分析一下吧!
回复  

使用道具 举报

7#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:56:43 | 只看该作者
实际上就是在境内为TAFE学生的移民申请做JRT测试。这个消息几个月前不已经由移民局的文件里透露过了?
回复  

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 17-12-2009 01:58:42 | 只看该作者
先顶了再看,谢谢楼主。
回复  

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:00:51 | 只看该作者
意思是说新政对offshore没影响?
回复  

使用道具 举报

10#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 02:04:45 | 只看该作者


目前的解读是,让已经申请的人也参加测试。也就是说,已经有TRA的人也要重新职业评估。
个人认为这个变动里有逻辑问题。

[ 本帖最后由 TtiGeR 于 17-12-2009 14:30 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 02:05:08 | 只看该作者
原帖由 kidd 于 17-12-2009 02:00 发表
意思是说新政对offshore没影响?


还没仔细看。

[ 本帖最后由 TtiGeR 于 17-12-2009 02:09 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

12#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:07:50 | 只看该作者

回复 #1 TtiGeR 的帖子

虎兄,Item 1对VAC2 退款的说明是原来法律里没有的?

不过退款的条件也太苛刻了
回复  

使用道具 举报

13#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 02:10:04 | 只看该作者
原帖由 MillerYang 于 17-12-2009 02:07 发表
虎兄,Item 1对VAC2 退款的说明是原来法律里没有的?

不过退款的条件也太苛刻了


退款部分还没有完全调整完,之后应该还会有所调整。
回复  

使用道具 举报

14#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 02:21:00 | 只看该作者
除了主要提及的Onshore调整外

Offshore的调整有:

New subclause 175.211(1) provides that in circumstances where the applicant has nominated a skilled occupation which is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for this subclause, the applicant must have been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24 months immediately prior to the day on which the application was made.

This amendment provides that applicants who nominate a skilled occupation, which has been specified by the Minister, must have been employed in the nominated skilled occupation for at least 12 months in the preceding 24 month period prior to making an application for a Subclass 175 (Skilled – Independent) visa.  This will ensure that applicants for a Subclass 175 (Skilled – Independent) visa, who have nominated a specified skilled occupation hold relevant up-to-date practical experience in their nominated occupation.

New subclause 175.211(2) provides that an applicant who has not nominated a skilled occupation described in subclause 175.211(1) must have satisfied either of the following:

§         been employed for at least 12 months in the period of 24 months immediately prior to the day on which the application was made; or

§         satisfied the Australian study requirement in the period of six months ending immediately prior to the day on which the application was made; and

§         each degree, diploma or trade qualification used to satisfy the Australian study requirement is closely related to the applicant’s nominated skilled occupation.

This amendment preserves the current requirement for an applicant for a Subclass 175 (Skilled – Independent) visa to have either been employed for 12 months in the preceding 24 month period prior to lodging an application or to have satisfied the Australian study requirement, using a degree, diploma or trade qualification, which is closely related to the applicant’s skilled nominated occupation, in the six months prior to lodging an application.

176, 475也是一样。

[ 本帖最后由 TtiGeR 于 17-12-2009 02:35 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

15#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 02:27:56 | 只看该作者
175, 176的调整大意是:

过去,175、176只要求申请前24个月内有12个月从事SOL列表中的工作(基本上包括了绝大多数工作)

法律调整后,如果你的提名职业是部长指定的部分职业,你必须在申请前24个月内有12个月从事该职业的工作。

具体是哪些职业,还没有公布。

举例说,假设计算机职业被列入其中,过去,只要能通过ACS评估,不论是否最近2年内有没有从事计算机工作1年,只要做了SOL列表中的任何工作满1年,既符合相关条件。但根据新政策,过去2年中必须有至少1年从事提名职业相关的工作。(此处用计算机只是举例,列表并未公布)

评分

参与人数 4威望 +120 收起 理由
香蕉酸奶 + 15 没分可加了!不过如果不公布具体职业,这个 ...
Michael.Sun + 50 谢谢分享!
stellahie + 20 谢谢分享!
MillerYang + 35 谢谢分享!

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

16#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:46:09 | 只看该作者
那么以前关于“提高雅思要求”“增加工作经验年限”“按照移民得分排优先级”之类的政策不会出台了吗?
我好想有点搞不清“移民政策”和“移民法”的区别
如果这次只是移民法的修改,那么之后还会有新政出台的可能吧?

[ 本帖最后由 glnofategl 于 16-12-2009 23:49 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:55:37 | 只看该作者
去年那个新政是在12月17日公布的吗?
移民局还非得来个周年纪念一下
回复  

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:56:47 | 只看该作者

回复 #16 glnofategl 的帖子

难道澳洲和中国一样有了相关法律还可以再随时加几条政策??
回复  

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 17-12-2009 02:57:23 | 只看该作者
暂时看似乎对我这个175 ACS影响不大,我四年都在同一个公司。其实我最怕它增加工作年限(到5-6年)或者雅思要4个7之类的。
回复  

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 17-12-2009 03:07:20 | 只看该作者
原帖由 zhengwei1984 于 16-12-2009 23:56 发表
难道澳洲和中国一样有了相关法律还可以再随时加几条政策??

我是觉得法律是法律,政策是政策
比如9月23日的那个就是政策而不是法律
不知我理解得对不对哦
回复  

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 17-12-2009 04:36:22 | 只看该作者
已经申请并且也递交TRA认证的也受影响吗?还需要重新做JRT吗?
回复  

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 17-12-2009 05:18:56 | 只看该作者
转自其他论坛:http://forum.migrationhelp.com.au/showthread.php?t=525

Judging by past Trade Testing undertaken (eg in 2003) where 95 percent failed, it is anticipated that approx 85 % or more will fail this new Trade Test.

********************************************************
Migration Help has heard the following:

the Job Ready Test options have been finalised by the Committee headed by DEEWR. Minister Evans will now make a decision based on the analysis by his Department officials, and based on Modelling, the best option for on-shore GSM for Trade courses.

An announcement is expected shortly with new changes likely to be brought in from the 1 Jan 2010.

Trade Testing is likely to start end Feb /early March.

It is anticipated a substantial number of applicants who have lodged their on-shore GSM applications prior to 1st Jan 2010 are likely to be Trade tested (TRA will likely refuse the majority of on-shore students cases to force them into a Trade Test).

Judging by past Trade Testing undertaken (eg in 2003) where 95 percent failed, it is anticipated that approx 85 % or more will fail this new Trade Test.

the VRQA has been given the power by the State Parliaments to take action against "dodgy" providers and name them on the website.
回复  

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 17-12-2009 09:59:36 | 只看该作者
虎老大,对已经申请的没有影响吧
回复  

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 17-12-2009 10:04:44 | 只看该作者
原帖由 glnofategl 于 17-12-2009 03:07 发表

我是觉得法律是法律,政策是政策
比如9月23日的那个就是政策而不是法律
不知我理解得对不对哦

对,政策必须以移民法做根据
所以要改什么追溯性一定要修改移民法,但一个法律的修改不是那么简单的
回复  

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 17-12-2009 10:52:05 | 只看该作者
谢谢虎老大分享
回复  

使用道具 举报

26#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 11:11:01 | 只看该作者
原帖由 glnofategl 于 17-12-2009 02:46 发表
那么以前关于“提高雅思要求”“增加工作经验年限”“按照移民得分排优先级”之类的政策不会出台了吗?
我好想有点搞不清“移民政策”和“移民法”的区别
如果这次只是移民法的修改,那么之后还会有新政出台的可能 ...


之后肯定还有大调整,但那些要等待明年才有定论。
回复  

使用道具 举报

27#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 11:11:33 | 只看该作者
原帖由 zhengwei1984 于 17-12-2009 02:56 发表
难道澳洲和中国一样有了相关法律还可以再随时加几条政策??


看改Act还是Regulation了

改Regulation还是比较容易的。
回复  

使用道具 举报

28#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 11:12:44 | 只看该作者
原帖由 glnofategl 于 17-12-2009 03:07 发表

我是觉得法律是法律,政策是政策
比如9月23日的那个就是政策而不是法律
不知我理解得对不对哦


923是部长Direction
部长根据Act和Regulation的相关规定制定的Direction
回复  

使用道具 举报

29#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 11:13:46 | 只看该作者
原帖由 helloworld1 于 17-12-2009 09:59 发表
虎老大,对已经申请的没有影响吧


刚才和人讨论了一下,觉得这里面有逻辑问题。过会打电话问问法律系的老师。

[ 本帖最后由 TtiGeR 于 17-12-2009 14:32 编辑 ]
回复  

使用道具 举报

30#
 楼主| 发表于 17-12-2009 11:14:59 | 只看该作者
原帖由 babyjean 于 17-12-2009 10:04 发表

对,政策必须以移民法做根据
所以要改什么追溯性一定要修改移民法,但一个法律的修改不是那么简单的


不麻烦。

如果改Migration Regulation 1994的话,今年(2009)已经改了15次了。主要的技术移民规定都在这个里面。

评分

参与人数 1威望 +30 收起 理由
蒙面超人 + 30 bad news

查看全部评分

回复  

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | FreeOZ用户注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|FreeOZ论坛

GMT+11, 5-12-2025 04:11 , Processed in 0.030871 second(s), 47 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表